Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • ronigami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    This would almost certainly rule out Linux as an option. What Linux vendor feels comfortable committing to something, anything, for 15 years?

    • ratten@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because Linux is free software, we can implement the fixes ourselves.

      Doing so with Windows or Crapple would literally be illegal.

      • ronigami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, but to fulfill that requirement the company would have to be around to review the code changes and merge and provide QA. For 15 years.