This website is filled with people who were banned for just that. Check out /c/Reddit ( pretty sure it’s on lemmy.world)
So yea, it’s happening, and is exactly what you were replying to. Calling that moderation is a pretty far stretch.
I’m gonna need an EU law citation there.
Because banning people for upvoting the word Luigi isn’t EU law.
That’s not what they’re asking for. They’re asking for the ability for it to not generate that sentence again.
Sure, but are you suggesting they somehow encoded, falsely, that they were a murder?
Because it’s very unlikely.
It fabricated this from no where. So there’s nothing to delete. Because it’s just a response to a prompt.
Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.
You cant even get it to count how many letter p are in the word apple. At least not last time I tried.
That storage your talking about isn’t facts. It’s how sentences are structured and what they “mean”.
As for the output “meaning” it’s still just guessing what you want to hear. No facts involved.
It’s not unreadable, it doesn’t exist.
The responses are just statistically what sounds vaugly what you want to hear.
They can erase the chat responses, but that won’t stop it from generating it again.
Generative AI doesn’t start with facts and work from there. It’s just statistically what you want to hear.
So the general tailscale actually uses peer to peer wiregaurd connections. Headscale is the middle point to negotiate these wiregaurd connections.
So none of the traffic moves through the VPS.
As for a VPS itself, it’s noore unsafe than your local bare metal. It’s still an application publicly exposed and needs basic precautions like fail2ban or crowdsec
You better believe when the cops come knocking, the burden of proof to be ethical is wholly on you.
All existing solutions are based on real life images. There’s no ethically way to acquire thousand upon thousands of images of naked children to produce anything resembling real.
That’s how existing solutions work.
So again, how can it be done ethically?
You can’t prove a negative. That’s not how prooving things work.
You also assume legal images. But that puts limits on what’s actually legal globally. What if someone wants a 5 year old? How are there legal photos of that?
You assume it can, prove that it can.
How can it be made ethically?
That’s my point.
It can’t.
Some human has to sit and make many, many, many models of genitals to produce an artificial one.
And that, IMO is not ethically possible.
I think all are unethical, and any service offering should be shut down yes.
I never said prosecute the user’s.
I said you can’t make it ethically, because at some point, someone is using/creating original art and the odds of human explotations at some point in the chain are just too high.
That’s not how these image generators work.
How would it know what an age appropriate penis looks like with our, you know, seeing one.
The only way to generate something like that is to teach it something like that from real images.
Is that why The UN
Is also demanding the same thing?
Do you really see the Palestinians being free? As they’re actively killed?
As for specific policies, how about removing any mention or distinction between any religion in the region.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_freedom_of_movement
How about freedom of movement to start?
You want to know what would stop that kind of thinking?
Ending apartheid
Okay, still a non sequiter then, because that law has nothing to do with what you responded. Which was the point of getting that law, because no where does it call the actions you replied to moderation.
And for all I know your a Russian troll so have fun with that.