Someone said Rust wasn’t very good at UIs in terms of performance. Though I don’t remember where it was published.

I do agree with you. Safety is important nowadays. Though if there’s a use case where Rust gets a very noticeable performance disadvantage (like UI), it may be better to just use C.

Well performance is important and Rust is fast on paper afaik but idk how it works in real use cases. I don’t remember seeing performance benefits on Rust compared to other languages that are not C.

That’s the issue. You liberals consider everything else hate. Also having to create another instance is segregation which is considered terrible by all of you.

That’s still a problem. It really doesn’t make the community look good. I think that also creates an issue similar to Big Tech networks where you don’t get opinions from all sides of arguments (unless you have many accounts on many instances).

I wish the Fediverse didn’t ban users for legal political opinions.

I saw some cheap laptops with Ubuntu in a local mall and on them the latency on Wayland was unbearable.

Well a lot of stuff for Linux is reverse engineered and some is just copied (WindowsFX, ElementaryOS etc). Kali Linux is also a thing.

Hmm that’s weird. I mean, we have a lot of copyright infringement and piracy here in the Linux world but I’m not sure if that’s the right way of handling it. I guess Facebook hasn’t grown up enough in terms or free speech yet.

Now please let’s not start stupid drama here.

An issue for sure. Larger code is never good.

I won’t. They’re all just KDE shills with gigabytes of Plasma crash reports in the respective directories anyways. /s

GNOME is the best DE.

Yet we still ban developers for political reasons…

I guess they didn’t expect to run out when they decided on the naming. But they will find a solution. Many companies went through that.

I can’t see anything exceptionally funny about it. But it is a very nice name. It reminds me of a small dog for some reason.

Coming to Ubuntu in 2026 and to Debian in 2035.