LongLive

You deleted many other comments, are you feeling fine?

What are these?

🐙🏳️‍🌈

God forbid a girl speedruns scoliosis. /jk

♥️

I was advised to compare the search terms with something else, as to make it comparitive to a “known control”.

I don’t know.
I enjoy on 3D pictures - stereograms /stereographs.

As a user who has not been educated in the field of content copyright legislation, I wonder what exactly are these new terms of service going to do.

“I CAN SEE THIS, WE ARE BOTH POOR”

I assume you are talking about subconscious fears?

Oh and how great it is to be able to learn

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-024-00418-y

The relative importance of attractivenesss and intelligence to the mate prefernces and choices of women and their parents.

The abstract is viewable for free. Both parents and daughters prefer the attractive mate.

I understand your point (I think I do) rationally. The difference is that I feel that any discrimination (figure, style, voice) is wrong… which is extreme, correct? I wasn’t very anxious about those because they felt controllable, and now I learn there is a different trait which I might not be conscious of, affecting my behaviour. That (belief) causes anxiety.

“Connecting”

“WPA2 secured”

“Requires authorisation”

“-> LunarFlamingo”

“Can’t connect to the internet”

I want to ask for help to deal with the cognitive dissonance I am experiencing. This information is proof that I (if this study applies to me) will discriminate people based on something they cannot control… which is wrong, correct?

The desk design is more modern than the hardware.

I am happy to see a thematically appropriate lamp and set of speakers.

“Magic 8 ball, will life on earth last long?”

“No”

tremor

5 volcanoes erupt

Clean your links! https://youtu.be/pwODwwgE6rA

I wonder what are the ToS, is this $0.79 all that you have to pay to use it for commercial purposes?

I am unconvinced that people / corporations can be neatly sorted into categories “good” or “bad”.

I argue that “good” behaviour is entirely dependent on who is the judge. There are numerous edge cases, for example, “don’t kill people”: one could argue that a company that promotes abstinence is reinforcing sexual shame, which could lead to suicide. Then another can argue that they are promoting degrowth (through abstinence), or even voluntary extinction.

Lastly I want to remind that breaking the notion that sorting people into categories like gender and sex is a similarly bad idea.

I sincerely doubt that there is a way to determine which behaviours/beliefs are good or bad. I, for example, doubt that I will get a rating of “good” beyond 75% (educated guess).

Literally never heard of the end user being billed for the codecs.

[Edit]: I think I should rephrase. Could I please be informed about how are codecs priced?