Mr Fish

I think there’s a big element of selective memory here. We love hearing about underdog stories, because they’re such a good show of courage, selflessness, and other great virtues. This means we are more likely to remember the parts of history where the underdog is the good guy.

On the other hand, I think you do have a point. Those who have the hardest fight to make the change they want, are the most likely to do it for selfless reasons. It makes much more sense to put yourself at risk if you aren’t fighting for yourself. So while wrong but well-meaning underdogs seem possible to me, actually bad people who just want to be on top aren’t likely to take the underdog route.

No. There’s always another chance. As long as at least one person is capable of thinking against fascism, there’s still hope.

But don’t take this as an excuse to do nothing. Every chance to push back that is missed is more damage done.

The lack of representation for most people is why he got elected the first time. Not that he’s any better, just a lot of people thought he was different from the average boring, corrupt politician.