I find it a bit misleading to focus on retractions. Articles being retracted is a necessary thing, and there is nothing more suspicious than a place that never retracted anything.
What matters here is obviously the nature of the retractions, the source of the problem, which generally means whether it’s a fraud or not.
Star Trek is way too leftist for this shit show.
So good people are doing this? Or trying to kick the “ugly” away isn’t evil, and is moray acceptable?
What’s your stance exactly?
deleted by creator
It wouldn’t be good at it, it would at most be a little patch for non audited code.
In the end it would just be an AI-powered antivirus.
Most performance optimisation can be done through improving algorithms and data structures, and knowing well the language you’re using.
I don’t think I’ve encountered any performance issue that wasn’t either:
Of course there are specific cases such as low-power environments and such, but that’s not what most people talk about when they talk about performance.
I also would like to point out my confusion with the obsession towards performance when it’s not needed (such as “is languageA 10% faster than languageB?”) but then everyone putting web technologies everywhere, from games to desktop software. It’s starting to feel like performance is more of a cult than a pragmatic question at this point.
I’m still not decided on which is worse, Picard or Enterprise. But I’d probably choose Picard.
But then anything is similar. Star wars is similar, even the lord of the rings has a group of various species collaborating to progress, it doesn’t mean that it is alike.
It’s a surface similarity, they explore space in funny outfits and that’s basically it.
The Orville is full of raunchy jokes, everyone is either an incompetent piece of shit, or just a piece of shit, morals are nonexistent, etc. That’s the opposite of the idea of Star Trek.
Star Trek is already not similar to itself. I’ve seen so many people say that it’s similar to the Orville for example and I can’t see how people manage to agree if they ever watched Star Trek.
In other words, the license is too broad to be similar to anything, as it’s not monolithic at all.
Somehow people don’t see it.
But I mean, some people like Enterprise , section 31 or Picard that contain the worst morals ever shown in a Star Trek show so people are not going to see the problem with the orville.
They’re not disagreeing, they’re just worried that it’s going too fast. Europe has been slowly going nazi but americans are a step further, and european politicians are worried that it will make people realize the fascisation of their societies.
And pretending to be against what’s happening in the US is reassuring the enlightened centrists.
Removed by mod
Because you can’t express your opinions without tiktok?
Wow, now that’s a smart take.
The fact that it even exists still shows how bad the state of programming is nowadays.
The idea is to not manage programs by hand to avoid messes.
The multiple solutions come from various needs, but it’s more of an underlying complexity of installation than a real intent to have so many.
Ideally we would need one clean package manager that handles everything without ever having to tinker with installation paths and various methods.
The article itself explains why. It indicates that it’s not Google’s first time trying to overhype something, and that the actual consequences of this event - assuming that it even happened as they describe it - is minimal or none.
You wrote “[bullshit]” wrong
Considering AIs are mostly a sect now, it doesn’t seem so unlikely.