Gravitwell

Why is it not mounted on the host/cointainer? I dont think you are using jellyfin “wrong” but its not like you cant just configure a mount point if you wanted to use jellyfin with it.

That is an interesting thing to point out though, im not actually sure but i think they used to support smb shares directly, i might just be thinking of kodi though.

Except you do need to acquire an online server somewhere, its just one that tailscale owns and controls instead of you, and when tailscale decides to enshittify and kill of their free tier you’ll be left wondering why you didn’t just rent a cheap VPS sooner.

Ask yourself, what is tailscale getting out of those “free” users that makes it worth providing services to them that they’d otherwsie need to rent a VPS for? What do you think their response would be if for example they got pressured about maybe too many users on their network are running a certain video streaming app?

I’m curious what kind of a use case you can think of that “traditional wireguard” can’t replace tailscale for.

Tailscale has a maximum of 3 users on their free tier, so it seems like a super limited use case of people who DIY their own servers for Jellyfin or HomAssistant or whatever, but just a tad too lazy to setup their own Wireguard service in addition to whatever it is they’d be using it for… I think the vast majority of free tailscale users have simply never actually tried wg-easy , because if they did they wouldnt need to use a third party service.

Just use normal wireguard, why do you need tails or heads at all?

I’ve never blocked threads, but i can’t even follow my own threads account (which i setup explicity to test the alleged feature).

Honestly I don’t think they are actually federated, maybe at one point they had been but it broke and they just didn’t bother fixing it because they already got all the positive PR they’re going to get from it at this point (and really it was mostly negative)

I run my own pleroma instance, so it could be that pleroma doesn’t support it and mastodon does, but i’ve really not seen any evidence of threads being federated with any mastodon servers either. If they do exist I’d love to see any example of a threads user organically interacting with a non-threads users, but i dont think it happens.

Edit: Did some testing using vivaldi.social which is for sure federated. Threads basically blocks all interactions to Fedi, they just make their posts visable to activitypub but NOT the other direction so any interaction is essentially one way. Threads users can see if someone “liked” their post on fedi, but they can’t see replies, or mentions, or post mentions of other non-threads usernames.

Really makes me think the whole “Fedipact” blocking things might be over blown, Meta is actually way more afraid of fediverse then we should be of them, after all, they can’t run ads or harvest data on other federated sites they don’t control.