• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Anyone else remember when the Bush administration considered people who read Linux Journal to be targeted for extra surveillance because they labelled Linux Journal an extremist forum for merely discussing the existence of Tor and Tails?

    Pepperidge Farm 'members.

    Further, anyone else remember when the Bush admin pushed Total Information Awareness, a program that was collecting the kind of information on US citizens that those same citizens give away freely to Facebook without needing to be surveilled?

    We 'member that, too.

  • buwho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    been noticing this too in linux fb groups i am in. peoples’ posts linking distrowatch are getting banned.

  • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I reckon, given the extent of voluntary submission to constant surveilance from corporations and the continued march deeper into oligarchy, that it’s only a matter of time until platforms that aren’t explicitly anti-privacy are going to be reframed as extremist and dangerous as a part of the global political conversation. Perhaps this will end up being the leading edge of that.

  • tekato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is there another example of this happening in Facebook aside for the openKylin post? I looked around and every article is only talking about this specific DistroWatch issue.

  • nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

    Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.