Summary:

The launch of Chinese AI application DeepSeek in the U.S. has raised national security concerns among officials, lawmakers, and cybersecurity experts. The app quickly became the most downloaded on Apple’s store, disrupting Wall Street and causing a record 17% drop in Nvidia’s stock. The White House announced an investigation into the potential risks, with some lawmakers calling for stricter export controls to prevent China from leveraging U.S. technology.

Beyond economic impact, experts warn DeepSeek may pose significant data security risks, as Chinese law allows government access to company-held data. Unlike TikTok, which stores U.S. data on Oracle servers, DeepSeek operates directly from China, collecting personal user information. The app also exhibits censorship, blocking content on politically sensitive topics like Tiananmen Square. Some analysts argue that, as an open-source model, DeepSeek may not be as concerning as TikTok, but critics worry its widespread adoption could advance China’s influence through curated information control.

  • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Of course it’s a national security threat, it’s just more proof that the US economy is just a giant ponzi scheme.

    If China can do it better on a budget of $6m in 18 months with low end equipment, then why does it take an American company 10 years, half a trillion dollars, and the entire nation’s supply of high-end graphics cards?

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The model isn’t afaik. I.e., if you download one of the models and run it locally. It’s the app with folks pasting proprietary, company secret, etc data into it.

      Really, it’s the same problem as with ChatGPT, but now an organization in another country has your data. I guess we’ll see if our new techno bro overlords try to use this to their advantage across the board to limit competition, even from local processing.

      Taking bets.

      • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I just find it amusing how when proprietary data/company secrets/whatever are being sent to openAI it’s a matter of “that was irresponsible don’t let it happen again” but some guy in Kentucky isn’t able to get a detailed description of Tiananmen Square from the US perspective without a little effort and it’s the end of national security as we know it.

        Same with the tiktok ban. How many classified military secrets do we think some regular dude in a trailer in Alabama really has on his phone?

        “National Security” in the US is literally just code for rich people’s bank accounts at this point.

        • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The War Thunder forum is a greater threat to “national security” than any of this AI whohash. Something, something, nickle…

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Same with the tiktok ban. How many classified military secrets do we think some regular dude in a trailer in Alabama really has on his phone?

          Depends. Are there any military things in Alabama?

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Uh . . no . . no we hav- I mean, I haven’t. Could you maybe upload some video of this “Huntsville”? Preferably in angles that are not otherwise obtainable via a sweep of existing Internet resources?

              We uh have a friend who is very interested in Huntsville, maybe you could focus on some of the city’s important areas and uh, industries.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well yeah, it’s obviously more of a risk to send directly to your rival than internally. Both are risky but one is much, much worse.

          • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            And what exactly is the average person sending to China that’s such a threat to US global Imperialism?

            Sure, ban it on government devices or whatever you want to do, but why should civilians be punished because the government can’t embezzle as efficiently?

              • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                And why should I be more worried about a hypothetical psyop that i might experience than the current psyops that I am experiencing?

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You are experiencing psyops from every direction. Some are just more obvious than others.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              And what exactly is the average person sending to China that’s such a threat to US global Imperialism?

              Am agreeink with these quesiton. Too many US politicians are not great leaders like Putin. And China.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Stupid users send private keys and other secrets to their AIs all the time. This is a big fucking threat to US global imperialism.

              The US trusts OpenAI (even if they shouldn’t) to not send hackers after US companies. They definitely don’t trust Chinese companies to have the same restraints.

              • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Unfortunately that’s just a danger on the internet. Stupid users are gonna get scammed whether it’s a stock trading AI that empties your bank account when you link it or a Nigerian Prince who just needs $5000 so he can unlock his fortune and repay you $100,000.

                Even then, what national security upending information does the average citizen have stored on their phone that they’re just whimsically uploading anywhere that’ll take a PDF? Like I said, I understand restrictions on devices used by government officials for official purposes, but to ban it unilaterally for civilian use as well seems excessive.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      First time you do something is always harder. OpenAI just didn’t think it was 1000x harder and thought they’d have more time to cash in.

      Myself, I think that being able to throw billions of dollars at hardware, and their focus on next-quarter results discouraged them from putting in the human effort to analyze and optimize their process. It turns out there were some fantastic optimizations to do.

      • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        MVP in Technology. OpenAI just sat around throwing salt to the wind piling up “value” until they can convince people it is worth some obscene amount of money to sell out. Once you give someone a literal milestone and show them the path, boom.

        This really really feels like a real life Tortoise and the Hare story. Like real hard, and I don’t feel the least bit bad for the hare.

      • Liv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        oh yeah, not denying that the prototype will be more expensive and resource intensive than following versions, but the whole “US overspends on novel technology, China blows that technology out of the water and shows this tech is both accessible and affordable, US bans Chinese product because American companies don’t want to compete” shtick is just getting old

        • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          They spent tens of billions of dollars already. Of course they don’t want cheap competition. That’s basic capitalism, nothing pro or against China.

    • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Deepseek used distillation, which is a way of extracting training information from other models through querying the model. In other words, some of the advances came from examining OpenAI’s models. Being first is hardest and took brute force.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not that America doesn’t have its own problem. But what do the suicide prevention nets looks like at your office. Because they’re everywhere in china because of shitty working conditions. This is how they do shit so cheap.

      • kipo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t understand why you’re getting downvoted. Labor laws in China are shit. A ton of people there work way more than 40 hours a week for less money than US Americans get, live on company “campuses”, and have suicide nets.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Many people online have been radicalised into thinking they have to be 100% for side A or for side B.

          When you put any criticism towards A or B, the supporters go absolutely wild. They will deny any problems with the side they’ve chosen.