• TimeNaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Then Arch is kind of a terrible choice for you. I use it (btw), but I’ve been using linux since 2008.

    The learning curve and constant need to troubleshoot things isn’t great for beginners.

    EDIT: can someone explain why I’m getting downvoted? Isn’t this common knowledge that Mint and other begginner-friendly distros that don’t have complicated package managers and require less configuration and maintenance are better for someone who’s just starting with Linux?

    I myself began with Ubuntu back in '08 but nowadays use both Arch and Mint.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s one of the reasons I chose arch. Because of the difficulty i can’t take shortcuts or be lazy and have to actually learn. When I tried something like Pop_OS I definitely enjoyed it but didn’t really learn anything because it was all done for me.

    • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      What are y’all doing that you need to troubleshoot constantly? My experience with arch is about the same as my experience with Debian.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I had way more struggle and frustration using mint/ubuntu than arch/endevourOS/openSuse TW

      🤷🏻‍♀️

      Using old kernel and mix of flatpak/repo/snap etc. Is just unpredictable, what happens and why. At least for me.

      I love, how in arch anything is verbose! Main reason I love linux and Arch especially.