• gsfraley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fedora is security? I mean, don’t get me wrong, I love it, it’s my daily driver after trying just about every distro under the sun, but I would’ve figured something like Qubes would stand head and shoulders above it.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Outside of everything else that has MAC enabled by default. It doesn’t even ship with a Firewall.

        • snowfalldreamland@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Fedora has firewalld by default but in the desktop version all ports are open by default. Pretty sure the server version only has ssh and cockpit exposed by default

        • qqq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I haven’t looked around that much in years beyond NixOS, what else has MAC by default these days? I remember a lot of the Debian based ones having some things constrained by AppArmor, but I personally prefer SELinux and it wasn’t everything.

          I don’t know if it ships with a firewall, but that’s definitely easier than an ad hoc SELinux setup. I always just transfer my iptables (nftables now) rules over.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Qubes is specialised, whereas Fedora is a general purpose distro with a security focus.

            • qqq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              AppArmor is great but it isn’t nearly as powerful as SELinux. Way more user friendly though.

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It can be but it takes a lot more effort.

                SELinux: high bar to entry but extremely power right away

                Apparmor: lower bar to entry but much harder to get advanced functionality and control

                • qqq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Yea, but there are also some things AppArmor just can’t do. Although in my experience most aren’t as big of a deal. Things like saying “only processes of this type can bind to port X” for example and much more fine grained control of file or directory actions. Does AppArmor provide kernel module controls?

                  They both have really bad documentation though :(