• Kbibble@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This article feels super rage bait-y to be honest. Like my first reaction at the title is of course, being like “thats fucked up” but as im reading it, it feels like this article was written in a manipulative way. There’s no sources at all, can’t find any using English google, decided to literally figure out how to search Dutch google in Dutch just to find something more reputable and there’s only this one site, which has 2 articles, the only 2 links in either is one article pointing to the other, and another link to what is clearly (from the add/article layout) a Belgium tabloid of some kind.

    Like nothing about the people involved or the situation, but this website is some shit, and so is the other one covering this. They may be on the right side of this story but this website itself feels incredibly un-credible, and I wouldn’t think to assume Belgium has some sort of news media problem where like, the gossip tabloids are the last bastions fighting for bodily autonomy and consent, where it would make sense that there is no other source.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    In Belgium a couple of years ago a brown student died during a hazing at a fraternity. Every one involved , all white and sons of doctors, lawyers and judges, basically came away scott free. They were all sentenced to community service and weren’t found guilty for criminal negligence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Sanda_Dia

    Belgium has a elitism problem. Bet if this rapist was a brown medical student or a street sweeper or something he would’ve gotten jail time.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    JFC, I was afraid this was in the US. I’m not pleased to realize there are other places just as fucked up. Though in the US the excuse for letting him off would have to be that he was rich, not brilliant.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    no sentence be passed as this would result in the accused having great difficulty in finding work in the medical profession.

    I wonder why the medical profession doesn’t want rapists… 🤔

    • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh, and he’s going to be an OB/GYN.

      Just a coincidence, of course. Because he cares that much about women.

    • slingstone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What’s the guys name? You’re right that we need to treat him like that other rapist, Brock Allen Turner.

        • slingstone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s just the one Brock Allen Turner, rapist, of which I’m aware. This other guy, though, needs to be made as famous as Brock.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hey, I’m really young and talented! I would hope to one day meet an awesome playmate like Lulu Chu. She is awesome like Tera Patrick but in a more docile… Oh my wife said no. Sorry Lulu! Maybe pen pals? I’ll check with my wife.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    18 hours ago

    " By finding him guilty but not punishing him, he will be made to feel guilty and the chance of him reoffending will be prevented, without socially impairing the man "

    So that judge is either a rapist or an idiot.

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ok I can understand if he was caught with pot, drug paraphernalia, or drunk driving (without injuring someone).

    But raping someone? Idc if you’re talented or have a bright future you should have it on your record or face a punishment like probation

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Thanks for pointing this out.

      He claims that he asked her several times if she consented and that he had been given the impression that she did.

      Seems like it was more of an “unintentional rape”, like manslaughter is unintentional murder. Wrong: yes. Bad judgment: yes. Deliberate malice: maybe not.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The man hasn’t been named by Belgian media. 😠

    Internet detectives, hear my call! Find the name of this rapist so that we may plaster it everywhere like the rapist Brock Turner!

  • kiagam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And when I say I don’t trust judges and that the justice system of most places is broken for giving a single person the final decision power, based on whatever they think is right, people say I’m trolling.

    Judges pull decisions out of their ass to fulfill whatever interest they have. Or sometimes just because they are stupid.

    Good judges are super rare.

    • Adiemus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re absolutely right unfortunately. I had to witness myself. That day, I lost my believe in our justice system (that was in Germany).

    • stormeuh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah in this case I think it’s more a case of “hey this guy looks kind of like my son”. In this case I think it led to a miscarriage of justice, but I think in other cases that kind of thinking could protect against excessively harsh punishments. In the end I think it comes down to inequality. Bigger inequality shrinks the pool of people judges can intuitively relate to, which in turn makes judgements more unequal.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    So if he’s gonna rape as a med student, he’s definitely gonna rape as a doctor. And that judge is a rapist too, judging from their warped views

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He probably did something similar in his past. Maybe raped a drunk girl at a party or similar while in undergrad. Never got caught for it, and never went on to do it again. So he figured if he can learn his lesson and not repeat the crime, why not this kid? Justice to the victims isn’t even considered.

  • DV8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh wow, something from Belgium showed up here. Obviously most reactions are the same here. But I would urge everyone to read more details about this. As there much more uncomfortable nuance here. One of those being that the dude is also in agreement he did something wrong. He also gave a relatively accurate description of the events of that evening that got proven with phone records and CCTV at different locations. Making his account of what happened at the least somewhat reliable.

    Obviously the woman could not consent because she was drunk as fuck. And she’s allowed to get drunk as fuck without being taken advantage off. CCTV showed them kissing at the bar they met. Phone records show he tried to call her friend she was supposed to go home with. CCTV shows them going to that friend’s dorm and not getting in and waiting there for half an hour. Then they walk back to his place while kissing on the way there. The morning after his messages to her indicate he wants to continue seeing her. (https://m.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20250402_95297572?journeybuilder=nopaywall but it’s in Dutch)

    Again, she could not consent, and he as the least drunk of both of them bears the responsibility of this. I do think he should have had some form of punishment above of what he got and for the woman’s feeling of safety a restraining order like she asked. And something that would have made mandatory counselling and follow-up possible. Not to mention that although justice in Belgium isn’t supposed to be revenge, it should also cause some sort of satisfaction for the victim.

    This situation just shows that the definition of rape over the decades has become more complex and nuanced, but unfortunately the tools to deal with this have not. This dude definitely did something wrong, but he’s not just a vicious predator.

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What does that matter if he was drunk to?

        Apparently not too drunk to undress her, and himself, then insert himself.

        This is rape.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          ??? She did consent, but while completely drunk. The argument being made is that she can’t consent while drunk, but he also consented while drunk. Did she rape him?

          • ihatefascist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This is neckbeard level of thinking and it’s gross, she couldn’t walk on her own and he brought her to his place and raped her, his level of drunkness was faaaar lower. Disgusting humans everyone that says tjis is ok to do. But that’s what you get when you were born with a small ugly dick, you need girls to be drunk to start sucking that tiny penis

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        It really depends on how drunk you actually were at the time, and that’s what makes cases like this so difficult. Generally speaking, simply being drunk isn’t enough.

        Hell, even being blackout drunk isn’t enough. Because you can be blacked out without being passed out; Blackout drunk simply means your brain isn’t recording things to your memory, so you won’t remember it after you sober up. Contrary to popular belief, alcohol doesn’t make you forget existing memories. It just makes it so you don’t ever commit things to memory in the first place. That’s what happens when you’re blackout drunk.

        In order to be incapable of consenting, you need to be so drunk that you can’t comprehend what is happening. Because informed consent requires two things: Information anbout what is happening, and enthusiasm. You can have both, even while blackout drunk. Because you forgetting your enthusiasm the next morning doesn’t automatically make it rape. After all, you were informed and enthusiastic when it was happening, so you consented. If you were capable of understanding what was happening and were enthusiastic, it’s not legally considered rape.

        And that’s a surprisingly high threshold to beat. You usually need to prove to the courts that you were basically passed out (and therefore unable to be informed about what was happening) before they’ll consider it rape.

        Even if people would colloquially consider drunk sex rape, that’s not typically how the courts view it. And that’s a large part of why so many accused rapists get off without a guilty verdict; The victim basically has to prove that they were missing either information or enthusiasm to overcome the accused’s “they consented to it” defense. And if the victim was blacked out and doesn’t even remember the evening, that becomes extremely difficult to do without outside witnesses corroborating that the victim was passed out and/or combative.

        And hell, in cases like the Brock Turner one, even when the victim proves that she was passed out, the rapist can still get away with just a slap on the wrist.

        • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          He can get away with it when he’s “Upstanding Citizen From An Impeccable Family, And This Would Ruin His Future.”

          In other words, a rich male white kid. Whose daddy plays golf with the attorneys, and judge.

          • DV8@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Because of the fallout about this the entire ruling was made public. It’s clear that the wording used everywhere is rage bait. Again I think he should not have gotten the sentence suspended but it’s not like the judges said it got suspended because he’s such a bright boy…

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Brock Turner?

          You mean convicted rapist Brock Turner?

          I just want to make sure that’s the rapist Brock Turner you’re talking about and not some other Brock Turner.

          I only know of one Brock Turner, and he definitely raped a woman, but the judge let him off easy because he has affluenze.

          The judge decided that a punishment might jeopardize the rich kid’s future, and cited that he hadn’t been brought up to realize the consequences of his actions. To my naive understanding that seems like a really teachable moment.

          By the way, in case anyone wasn’t sure: Brock Turner, the convicted rapist, raped a woman and got away with it because his parents are rich.

          • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            How dare you besmirch Brock Turner.

            The convicted rapist FORMERLY known as Brock Turner is now known as Allen Turner!

            Get it right!

            /SARCASM

            Fuck that guy. I hope it follows him the rest of his life.

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Rapist Brock Turner, aka rapist Allen Turner, who got a 6-month slap-on-the-wrist sentence for what his father called (and I quote) “twenty minutes of action”? That rapist Brock Allen Turner? The one who only served 3 months?!

            • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              “Hell, your Honor, he had whiskey dick! It took 13 minutes to get it up! How much damage could he have done!”

              Disgusting.

              I wonder if he would have felt the same if a bunch of Frat Bros had cornholed his son in a “Hazing Ritual.”

            • stringere@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Yeah, Brock aka Allen Turner! The rapist who barely got inconvenienced after he raped a woman who was passed out. The one who had two guys testify against him because they interrupted him in the middle of raping someone.

              That rapist Brock Turner.

      • DV8@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are different levels of being drunk. She was so drunk she blacked out and had trouble walking. He As drunk but can supply a recollection of what happened. There’s nuance like I said, but someone who can recollect events and relies on his rational actions where he called her friends can logically be considered to be more responsible for not taking into consideration she was too drunk to be able to consent.

        • 1847953620@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Alcohol impairment can be very messy. I know someone who had 1 and a half drinks, had no speech slurring or obvious signs of being black-out drunk, but did not remember a third of the night the next day because she’s a lightweight that’s drank a single-digit number of times in her life (she’d also eaten very little that day and had some recent sleep debt). I would not have guessed she was blackout drunk, she was just talking about her problems and was articulate the entire time I saw her. If I didn’t know she had been drinking, I can’t think of how I would’ve known short of some kind of specific motor function test that’s made to suss that out/harder than just sitting around, talking, and occasionally going to the restroom. She just looked a little tired. When we spoke later, she didn’t remember basically anything after a certain point (a couple of hours’ worth) and wondered if some vague flashes of memories had been dreams. It was rather surprising to me.

          • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s the difference between blackout, and passed out.

            People who are blackout drunk can be walking and talking, and not remember anything later.

            Passed out is unconscious.

    • spirinolas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yes, the rapist Brock Allen Turner is also the first thing that crossed my mind. How he got away after raping that girl and now is even trying to change his name.

    • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hey all, anyone who cares about/is interested in knowing more about the crime committed by the rapist Brock Allen Turner should read Know My Name, written by the woman who was actually assaulted, Chanel Miller.

      I highly recommend listening to the audio book, as she reads it herself and has a powerful voice.

  • Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    By finding him guilty but not punishing him, he will be made to feel guilty and the chance of him reoffending will be prevented, without socially impairing the man

    What a load of horse shit. “Letting him get away with rape penalty free will ensure he doesn’t do it again” is some crazy fucking logic. Seems like knowing there are no consequences for your actions would make repeating the offense significantly more likely.