• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

      • TON618@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It’s genius!

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Likely it’ll use the cloud for processing, you’ll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like “prompt by default” and “AI autocomplete”, which you can only “snooze” as they’ll automatically be turned back on the moment there’s a “great new feature”, like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it’s made by real artists.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

    Got questions about a medication?

    Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

    AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you’ll think you are in this alternate universe.

    • vane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why use head if you can use ChatGPT. Remove head and start working smarter.

    • vivendi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t fucking understand why Lemmy is permanently stuck in 2023 with AI

      Using RAG (retrieval augmented generation) results in much lower, almost negligible confabulation rates

      • thiseggowaffles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Generally speaking, people used ChatGPT back when it first came out, had a bad experience and never fucked with it again, so their understanding of it is frozen in time. Most people know next to nothing about the current state of AI unless you’re a researcher or enthusiast. They’re completely unprepared for the actual state of the industry.

        • vivendi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh fucking -please-

          This place is genuinely more insufferable than Reddit. That is actually an achievement

          Whatever dude, writhe in your own ignorance

          • Dumhuvud@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Making an assumption regarding the entirety of a social network with at least tens of thousands of users based on a single inflammatory comment (mind you, a comment that has more downvotes than upvotes)? That’s a bit of a small sample to extrapolate from, don’t you think? You should’ve probably asked ChatGPT if that’s the right call.

            • vivendi@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’ve seen this stupidity all over lemmy. It’s like, people “group psychology” -ed this thought into the central culture of lemmy and refuse to budge.

              It also doesn’t help that capitalists are using AI to take people’s jobs and also a misunderstanding of how image diffusion works had lead to the artistic line of people to also hate AI

              Nobody likes to fucking listen. People like to be smug.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here’s your evidence that there’s no such thing.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    This can’t happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it’s got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you’re paying them a titbit more than what the service they’re providing is worth.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m sure they’re less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome’s market share

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The sheer market share that forces websites develop for chrome for maximum visibility, to force websites to allow their content to be scraped to be usable by the average user.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they’re charging. From what I read, I think they’re still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.

  • rippersnapper@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.