By a 4-3 margin, the Arizona State Board for Charter Schools on Monday approved an application from Unbound Academy to open a fully online school serving grades four through eight.  Unbound already operates a private school that uses its AI-dependent “2hr Learning” model in Texas and is currently applying to open similar schools in Arkansas and Utah.

Under the 2hr Learning model, students spend just two hours a day using personalized learning programs from companies like IXL and Khan Academy. “As students work through lessons on subjects like math, reading, and science, the AI system will analyze their responses, time spent on tasks, and even emotional cues to optimize the difficulty and presentation of content,” according to Unbound’s charter school application in Arizona. “This ensures that each student is consistently challenged at their optimal level, preventing boredom or frustration.”

Spending less time on traditional curriculum frees up the rest of students’ days for life-skill workshops that cover “financial literacy, public speaking, goal setting, entrepreneurship, critical thinking, and creative problem-solving,” according to the Arizona application.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Online charter schools are horrifying. There is no expectation that the teacher know or understand the material they are teaching your child. High school is basically working through an online work book by yourself. Teachers use AI to “look up” answers they don’t know yourself.

    It’s hell.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    “Time for home economics! Today we learn to make pizza. Be sure to use plenty of glue on the dough so the cheese doesn’t slide off!”

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Buncha damned bullshit. Those kids better start reading more literature before those ai fuckwads get started

  • kipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 hours ago

    the AI system will analyze their responses, time spent on tasks, and even emotional cues

    That means every student is going to be recorded with a camera and microphone? Is anyone else horrified by the fact that the AI software is going to be actively watching and listening to these kids?

    Or is it going to analyze typed responses only? (which is still creepy AF, btw)

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m sure their privacy policy will heavily favor the students personal rights and that their backend database will be hackproof…

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My suspicion is students who understand the situation will try to game the system. Like they do with organic teachers, too.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They already do with online charters. Teachers don’t know the material, they just spam AI generated essays and answers. Teacher work loads are so much that they don’t check the responses.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At some point the AI says…fuck this guy, here color this shit and watch this movie. Eventually the student becomes a great painter.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    🤦‍♀️

    The annoying part is that some time of self paced computerized curriculum is genuinely a good idea that I’ve been supporting for ages. But the whole premise is that this allows the teacher to spend more time in one on one instruction to get students over the hump when they have questions.

    It doesn’t work as an excuse to throw out the teacher.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Depends if this is an AI designed specifically for education, or just ChatGPT wearing a mortarboard.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It doesn’t.

        Using various AI techniques for things like pacing classes might be useful (though I’m guessing you could do just as well algorithmically). But you can’t replace human instruction in the process.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    AI has it’s usecases, but it’s not currently at a place where students can be left alone with an AI. This is dumb.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Keep kids dumb so they turn into dumb voting citizens and a big fuck you to teachers too! Whomever came up with this really deserves to get rich. This embraces so many modern American ideals all at once. If they haven’t thought about helping to lower the cost by placing ads into the platform, I would like to take credit for this idea.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve found Kahn pretty good, but do they use AI? As in LLMs, or just nural nets? And what does it tweak?

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I preferred Khan when it had the knowledge web. Not everyone jives with gamification or personalization.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let the charter schools try this first. Eventually something like this will be integrated into common education, but the first attempts are guaranteed to be disasters. Let those fall on 1/4 of learning time of a small subset of Arizonian charter school students and not “all California public school students” or the like.