• lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t see the problem. It’s from a company called “Dragon Lawyers”. If it was idk “Flower Lawyers” they could put a flower with a tie or something. What is it with those snowflakes not being able to handle a decent watermark. It’s not like it’s somehow offensive.

    • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      NGL, I think it looks really unprofessional. Imagine “flower lawyers” putting a tulip in a cartoon suit and giving it a menacing expression, it would look just as dumb. Likewise, a dragon could make for a much classier design if approached in a different way.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I saw tons of billboards in southwest Tennessee for a law firm called “Lion Law” and all their billboards had pictures of animals and some kind of play on words, like a picture of a snake and the caption was something like “divorce that snake in the grass today!”

      And I was just like “damn, that’s kinda clever.”

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pretending this country has any professionalism whatsoever. Considering who is president and the shitty behavior of most politicians … get fucked.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Judge should be fired. Does the dragon somehow change the words on the page? If the watermarks affects the ability for screen readers, then fine. Otherwise, the judge is clearly unable to form an unbiased opinion and is willing to allow something irrelevant like appearance bias their cases.