Back in January Microsoft encrypted all my hard drives without saying anything. I was playing around with a dual boot yesterday and somehow aggravated Secureboot. So my C: panicked and required a 40 character key to unlock.

Your key is backed up to the Microsoft account associated with your install. Which is considerate to the hackers. (and saved me from a re-install) But if you’ve got an unactivated copy, local account, or don’t know your M$ account credentials, your boned.

Control Panel > System Security > Bitlocker Encryption.

BTW, I was aware that M$ was doing this and even made fun of the effected users. Karma.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It takes a screenshot every five seconds and runs an LLM over it to extract text. Then there’s a UI where you can query it for what you did in the past.

          It came under fire when they wanted to introduce it last year, because it stored all that data on your disk in unencrypted form. Meaning if anyone manages to run malicious code on your system, they don’t need to do the collecting themselves anymore, but can rather just send off any screenshotted passwords or whatever other secret things you might’ve been doing on your PC at any point in time. In particular, Microsoft had claimed that the data would be encrypted and it wasn’t. Didn’t even need special permissions to access it.

          No idea, if they fixed the encryption now, or if this is just a case of the shitstorm having died down, so they roll it out now. But yeah, even with encryption, the implications aren’t great. If your parents or boss or law enforcement want to know what you were doing on your PC, they now have an exact history. And Microsoft could still change their mind and decide to upload all your data at any point in the future.

            • Ephera@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, good question. I imagine the screenshotting itself is largely negligible, although obviously not free either. I don’t know when the LLM gets to do its job. Theoretically, it could be delayed until some point where there’s not much going on on your PC.

              At some point, Microsoft wanted to roll out these AI features only on PCs which have an NPU, which is basically an additional CPU with a different architecture optimized for pattern recognition and such. I don’t know, if they still hold onto that requirement, but it would mean that it wouldn’t hog your CPU at least.

              They have been somewhat desperate to roll out Recall, because it was the only semi-useful out of a handful of features that they came up with to somehow integrate AI into Windows. So, that’s why I’m never quite sure, what requirements they’re still holding onto.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Holy shit, they automatically activate it on computers without an account to back the key up to?

    That’s just malicious

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      IIRC, they only do this if you’re logged in with a Microsoft account.

      Bitlocker is disabled by default if you only use local accounts

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ve occasionally seen it activate itself on computers with only a local account, though I’ve so far only seen it when upgrading in place to 11 with secure boot enabled in the BIOS, and not every time. Fortunately the one time it locked me out was on a freshly cloned drive, so it only cost me redoing the work.

        Also, the number of people who I’ve seen lose all their data because they don’t even know they created an MS account during OOBE, and later had a boot or BIOS hiccup, is too damn high!

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    They desperately wanted to eliminate personal computers and replace them with dumb terminals running over the net.

    When the public rejected this idea

    THIS is their response. They are still insisting on total control of our computers.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not that it helps now, but you can also dump your bitlocker recovery key through powershell and save it independently.

    (Get-BitLockerVolume -MountPoint “C”).KeyProtector

    • yesman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The control panel dialogue allows you to do this as well. Control Panel > system security > Bitlocker encryption. But it also has the superior option which is to turn it off.

      I didn’t loose any data BTW. I had my M$ account info, and a backup besides.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Disk encryption should absolutely be used, especially on laptops/portable systems.

        Otherwise someone steals your laptop and swaps the disk into another system and they’ve got all your stuff. Including that folder that nobody knows about.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile in Linux with luls, which I’ve had since a pre-pre-pre version somewhere back in the early 2000’s, I can have multiple keys, all works like sunshine, never had problems.

    On windows… So we work with highly sensitive data, and ever since I came in I thought it insane that people working remote don’t have that highly sensitive data encrypted. We can’t switch Linux yet, so okay, we go for BitLocker.

    Boy oh boy oh boy was that a mistake.

    50 remote users, 5 get encrypted devices with BitLocker as a trial and within a month, 3 of them already got locked up permanently because apparently it’ll pwrma lock itself after x amounts of invalid passwords which is just incredibly stupid. But don’t worry, there is a backup key! Yeah, that is lie 48 characters that we’d had to pass by phone and they have to type it flawlessly.

    Suffice to say, the remote users will be running Linux soon, like it or not.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, that is lie 48 characters that we’d had to pass by phone and they have to type it flawlessly.

      Wouldn’t be so bad if everyone knew their Alpha Bravo Charlies

      My one talent: alpha bravo charlie delta echo foxtrot golf hotel India Juliet kilo Lima mike November Oscar papa Quebec Romeo Sierra tango uniform Victor whiskey x-ray Yankee Zulu, typed using voice to text

      • ferngully@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        You have a point. But Bitlocker recovery keys are all numeric. Really not all that hard to translate over the phone. Typically a secure email is what we use to deliver since 99% of employees also have email on their mobile devices.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’m with you. I also manage about 800 devices at my current role and I’ve never had any major issues with BitLocker.

        I’m tempted to think they’re just lying but that’s a little mean. Maybe they just didn’t know? I don’t know but BitLocker is not the problem here.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I suggest we move all our machines over to Linux, which is the actual plan. Fuck everything about windows

        Also, permanently locking a device after x failed attempts is just plain silly, security wise. You know I can take that drive out and just try to brute force it a million times per second without that silly rule being in my way, right? It’s an anti security pattern similar to requiring password changes every week, it’s a bad idea.

  • Ptsf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve actually had this occur before to a machine I specifically disabled the tpm on so that it wouldn’t happen (it was an account less frozen kiosk). I was fuming the entire time I spent rebuilding it.

  • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just installed Manjaro on my daily driver over the weekend. My entire steam library just works. My dev tools all work(better) on Linux, and free office is nice and familiar. Fuck widows.

  • Read Bio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why cant windows copy luks and let you choose your own password

    • thomasloven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not ”leaving bitlocker off”, though. It’s ”be aware about it and turn bitlocker off manually” since it’s enabled by default in the latest updates.

      • stonedtemplepilot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s false. My Windows partition didn’t magically enable bitlocker and I’m on 24h2. LTSC build and local account tho.

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    This has been happening to people randomly for years. Ysed to get calls about it all the time, and that was pre-covid