• madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Don’t give it away.

    If you really want to help people, buy media, buy politicans and get REAL change that will actually last.

    You giving money to random charities does fuck all, except give you tax breaks.

    We need change in the political system so that we don’t need fucking charities for basic needs.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sorry Bill but it’s too late and not enough. I still want to eat the rich and that includes you.

    Although I‘ll admit if all billionaires did this instead of - oh you know - investing in fascism and actively dismembering democracy globally I might feel different about this. But as things stand I am done with billionaires. We cannot coexist. Simple as that.

  • polysexualstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Bill Gates is 69. By 2045 he’s going to be 89. What’s he going to do with all that money at 89 anyways, after he kept it all his life.

  • FireAtWill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Gates is an unusual man who deserves a lot of praise. Most billionaires only want to build monuments to themselves. Gates has picked off a lot of projects that have virtually no chance of being funded by anyone or anything else. That’s epic and legendary.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Bill Gates deserves a lot of shit for creating the original big tech monopoly. But I’ll say this about him: At least he’s not hoarding his money to build a secretive compound to hold hundreds of kids he spawned with right wing crazy women for the purpose of creating a future master race.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How do you know this? It would cost less than 1% of his wealth, and it was an objective of his good friend Jeffrey Epstein.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ll take whatever win I can get at this point. I just hope that it’s actually going to good causes that will actually help people and not just bullshit money laundering “charity” shell games.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    How about by tomorrow you sadistic evil fuck?

    You may have spent billions to look pretty and nice to people but nobody should forget how he got those billions in the first place

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And it’s working. His charity is extremely visible, while the public doesn’t understand how much he took and deadweight lost with his monopoly.

      It’s like a burglar breaking your window, stealing your TV…

      Years pass…

      Here have a free TV! I am so generous!

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But his charity works abroad a lot, so isn’t it more like a burglar stealing your TV, selling it and buying lifesaving drugs for third world children for the money?

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          lobbying the gov for strict IP law, he buys pharma stock before awarding the contracts for buying all the drugs to make money on that as well

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, I mean, a quick Google search shows his net worth at 133b. 113b x 0.01 = 1.13 billion dollars.

      For context, bill is 69 yo, and the average US male lives to about 76 yo. That’s a difference of six years, or 2190 days. That means that Bill would have to scrape by on just $519,000/day.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Bullshit, he’s “transferring” his wealth to his own charity for tax reasons…

    It’s a trick to protect his money for his children.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not according to the opening sentence?

      The Gates Foundation plans to give away $US200 billion ($313 billion) over the next 20 years before shutting down entirely in 2045

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          He was anti-competetive towards Netscape navigator, admitted guilt and paid for it, since then he’s putting his money where his mouth is. Anything else I left out?

          Microsoft has gone to shit after he left.

          Lemmy sounds exactly like magas

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Damn, Erika must be hanging around the wrong spaces. Don’t get me wrong, the liberalist ones are full of idealistic drivel like that, it’s true, but any Marxist space will drill into you their famous quote:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theses_on_Feuerbach

      The document is best remembered for its epigrammatic 11th and final thesis, “Philosophers so far have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it”, which is engraved on Marx’s tomb.

  • radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    He has been making this kind of promise since the early 2000s, but never follows through. Just the goal post keeps moving to the right.

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      While the goal post keeps moving, it’s the opposite of your statement. As explained in the article:

      That target would represent a doubling in spending for the nonprofit, which has disbursed more than $US100 billion since it was co-founded by Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates in 2000. Originally, the foundation was set to close 20 years after the Microsoft co-founder’s death.

      “I have decided to give my money back to society much faster than I had originally planned,” Gates, 69, wrote in a statement. “I will give away virtually all my wealth through the Gates Foundation over the next 20 years to the cause of saving and improving lives around the world.”

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Supposedly he’s already given away half, why is it unthinkable that he’s planning to give away the other half?

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Because good people don’t hoard wealth to begin with.

        He does this so people don’t hate him for helping to destabilize the global economy.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I think only allowing bad people to hoard wealth would be a moral failure if a good person had the opportunity to choose.