- cross-posted to:
- ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- cross-posted to:
- ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/26082031
The house style of the New York Times is severely outdated. Depending on the topic, the newspaper’s purportedly impartial tone instead reads as smug, self-amused, and deeply lazy. The results are disastrous when applied to a recent article which sincerely considers the idea that Rachel Griffin-Accurso, the popular children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel, might […]
Archived version without paywall: https://archive.is/yE3mF
You must log in or register to comment.
The New York Times is a trash news source. I wish more realized this.
Someone needs to kick that interviewers face in. Being a lobbyist and asking loaded question is one thing, but being a journalist for a newspaper that understands itself to be a pillar of democracy and asking such an obvious bullshit question needs to be met with a harsh reaction.
Oh, so how dare a (checks notes) children’s entertainer give a fuck about children!
That article is bullshit
There’s the NYT article about Ms. Rachel. Nowhere in there do they accuse her of being funded by Hamas, they just soft-peddle the agitator group that DID accuse her.
Standard mayo sandwich bullshit, but they never even talked to Ms. Rachel, so how could they “ask her if she’s paid by hamas”?
Lies always work better when surrounded by truth
The nyt? Oh you mean the non stop American media propaganda machine nyt… that one??
Who pays their bills and bonuses???
