• kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nah. If you put two plates in front of me and one had a regular burger on it and the other had a burger that was as wide as the plate itself, I’d pick the one that most accurately reflects how much I hate myself at that moment.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s in comparison, the plate you’re eating off of is the closest thing to compare it to so covering more of it makes it seem bigger

    This is why buffets use small plates

  • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    But if it is wider it cooks through more. A nice thick patty gives me a nice tasty medium rare burger that soaks the bun with burger juice.

  • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A&W tried something like this. Sold a 1/3 pound burger because its bigger than the popular Quarter Pounder sold by its competition, larger than a Whopper even. It undersold and when people were asked why; it turns out people think 1/3 is less than 1/4. By the numbers, here.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Tbf any variation of “one third of a pound” is a shit name, so all this proves is that they failed to market the product.

        The real answer is likely that extra wide buns are not available from suppliers, and nowhere bakes their own bread these days. For the chains that have their own off-site bakeries and supply chains, the majority of consumers probably don’t want a much bigger burger, and those that do have big enough mouths to fit extra tall burgers, or buy 2 burgers which are easier to eat. I know if I’m extra hungry I’ll grab 2 cheeseburgers, but most of the time 1 plus the mandatory chips is enough childhood nostalgia junk for me. I wouldn’t care about a 50% wider cheeseburger.

        • Tower@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re likely all getting their buns (and everything else) from Sysco anyways, so I can’t imagine different sized buns would be that hard to source.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ok I’ve always hated this “advertising study”. A&W is a small fish in a big pond. Expecting their shitty third pounder to outsell a core McDonalds menu item in its prime is a Herculean task. Americans do suck at math but maybe your burger sucked a bit more.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Murica!

      To be fair, I can’t think of a good name for a 3rd of a pound. “Thrice Slice” looks good, but is cumbersome to pronounce, and it sounds like a pizza.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I mean, humans completely suck at evaluating vertical distances, thinking that taller = more is just further evidence, I’d say

  • acidbattery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Buns and patties would have to come in two different sizes for wide and regular burgers, and it’s probably more economical for restaurants to make them all in one standard size.

  • Tamsin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, I can’t argue with the little girl though, I like that tall thin glass better as well.
    Add a fun straw and some decorations and I’m all in.