Optional@lemmy.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logicwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down117cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1129arrow-down1external-linkChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logicwww.tomshardware.comOptional@lemmy.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareElectricblush@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down15·3 months agoThis is so stupid and pointless… “Thing not made to solve spesific task fails against thing made for it…” This is like saying that a really old hand pushed lawn mower is better then a SUV at cutting grass…
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down9·3 months agoSUVs aren’t marketed as grass mowers. LLMs are marketed as AI with all the answers.
minus-squareotp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down9·3 months agoI’d be interested in seeing marketing of ChatGPT as a competitive boardgame player. Is there any?
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoThese tools are marketed as replacing lots of jobs that are a hell of a lot more complex than a simple board game.
minus-squareotp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months ago These tools are marketed as replacing lots of jobs that are a hell of a lot more complex than a simple board game. There isn’t really a single sliding scale of “complexity” when it comes to certain tasks. Given the appropriate input, a calculator can divide two numbers. But it can’t count the number of R’s in the word “strawberry”. Meanwhile, a script that could count the number of instances of a letter in a word could count those R’s, but it couldn’t divide any two numbers. Similarly, we didn’t complain that a typewriter couldn’t put pepperoni slices onto a pizza.
This is so stupid and pointless…
“Thing not made to solve spesific task fails against thing made for it…”
This is like saying that a really old hand pushed lawn mower is better then a SUV at cutting grass…
SUVs aren’t marketed as grass mowers. LLMs are marketed as AI with all the answers.
I’d be interested in seeing marketing of ChatGPT as a competitive boardgame player. Is there any?
These tools are marketed as replacing lots of jobs that are a hell of a lot more complex than a simple board game.
There isn’t really a single sliding scale of “complexity” when it comes to certain tasks.
Given the appropriate input, a calculator can divide two numbers. But it can’t count the number of R’s in the word “strawberry”.
Meanwhile, a script that could count the number of instances of a letter in a word could count those R’s, but it couldn’t divide any two numbers.
Similarly, we didn’t complain that a typewriter couldn’t put pepperoni slices onto a pizza.
Source?