• Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I thought the same, since my city did away with the 3-month rule two years ago (there’s still a partner-limit/monogamy requirement last I checked).

      Apparently what makes it a “world first” is not that they allow gay donors but that they lifted all sexual activity-based rules (for plasma specifically) which used to reject sex workers, women who slept with bi men recently, and others. The title is just a bit misleading.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thank you! That always bugged the hell out of me.

    Someone actually thought that gays fuck around with everything and everyone but heterosexuals? Naaahh, they would nevah!

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gay men are statistically more likely to contract HIV. Of course, it would be horribly irresponsible and negligent not to test donated blood/plasma for HIV in the first place, so yeah, kinda dumb.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    …why was that ban in effect to begin with? I can understand during the 80s, with the misunderstandings of AIDS.

    Basically by 1992, this shouldn’t have been a thing.

    • renegadesporkA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s the answer. It’s institutional homophobia left over from the AIDS epidemic.