If later text shows that my initial reading was incorrect due to missing context or because I misread their starting point, yeah. For example, if something starts off sounding positive but context shows it is actually a dogwhistle I had not come across before I will go back and correct my votes. It rarely takes even a minute to fix a dozen or so in a chain.
It isn’t so much that I think my individual votes matter, but because I don’t like knowing I gave a positive interactions with that thing.
Same thing if I read something as a negative and find out I was wrong, gonna flip those to upvotes!
Sometimes. I might get halfway through the comments and see that someone has shared something from their post history that paints them in a different light.
Or if they add an edit whining about downvotes
Edit: DOWNVOTES? REALLY? For speaking the objective truth?
I upvoted this assuming the edit was humor, don’t you dare prove me wrong!
Le thanks Le kind le stranger. Many updoots to you and your clan, m’trilby
Ah a fellow haberdasher #tips-lady-fedora
My up/down votes gets as much attention as their importance warrants. None at all.
Who cares that much
I guess both of us
No because when I upvote someone it usually means I agree with their point. Disagreeing later doesn’t change the initial agreement.
Even if it was manipulative or disingenuous?
If I agree with their point, again, I don’t care if I later find reasons or points to disagree on something different. It will not make me waste my time adjusting upvotes. Common ground is very important.
