• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Forbes did the math once and determined that Smaug, a dragon embodied by greed and selfishness, is worth $62 billion. There are 17 people richer than him.

    Smaug was shot in the heart and it was a morally good act.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d be willing to bet that Smaug caused less death and destruction than many (if not most) billionaires

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fyi that math was heavily contested, i agree with the sentiment but a literal mountain full of gold, assuming the market wouldnt crash, would make him the richest person on the planet.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        We don’t actually know the size of the hoard, though. We know it’s big enough for him to sleep in it, and we know the Arkenstone was worth one share of it, but we don’t have specific numbers (at least, none I can see). Any valuation has to be an estimation, and any estimation will be contested.

        Also, the value of gold today is 75 times that of what it was in the 1930s, which makes it even harder to put a price on Smaug’s hoard.

        Regardless of the specific number, there is a certain level of wealth and greed that makes it morally good to shoot someone through the heart. Smaug is not the only one to have hit that threshold.

    • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t support violence at all. But for every mentioned woodchipper, this scene from Tucker & Dale vs Evil is mandatory:

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Asking this on lemmy is like asking a pack of wolves if they enjoy the taste of lamb. You already know the answer you’re going to get…

  • ALQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    Billionaires shouldn’t exist; no one needs that much money. They should be taxed until there are no more billionaires.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    What a funny thing to ask on Lemmy.

    I prefer mine well done, and grilled to perfection personally.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think they’re bad for the economy. Money has to circulate. Every time a billionaire throws another million on the pile, they make things worse for everyone else.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is a view we don’t see often enough. Everybody is into hating billionaires the way teenage girls hate the super-hot cheerleader. All they do is complain that it’s not “fair” for somebody to be so rich. There’s not enough discussion of the purely mechanical reasons extreme wealth is bad for the economy, not to mention the corruption opportunities it creates. The ultra-rich don’t spend their money, they just exchange it to trade big blocks of asset ownership back and forth. None of that money ever gets spent on a loaf of bread or a bus ticket, or a GI Joe with the kung fu grip. It essentially disappears from the economy. I don’t think most people even comprehend how that works - it involves more thought than reacting to memes.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        They literally steal work out of the system like a parasite. As you say, we shouldn’t be envious, but fix the problem with the money leaking away.

  • Apollo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ideally they’d be taxed into no longer being billionaires.

    Realistically we probably need to violently remind them who holds the actual power before this becomes a reality.