A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      know what? let’s just skip the middleman and have the CEO undergo the same operation. you know like the taser company that tasers their employees.

      can’t have trust in a product unless you use the product.

      • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I understand what you are saying is intended as „if they trust their product they should use it themselves“ and I agree with that

        I do think that undergoing an operation that a person doesnt need isnt ethical however

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hey boss ready for your unnecessary heart transplant just to please some random guy on the internet?

        Yeah so let’s get this done I’ve got a meeting in 2 hours.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Then it’s all Inner Space and invented nanobots. So you win some, you lose some.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You underestimate the demands on a surgeon’s body to perform surgery. This makes it much less prone to tiredness, mistakes, or even if the surgeon is physically incapable in any way of continuing life saving surgery

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not fair. A robot can watch videos and perform surgery but when I do it I’m called a “monster” and “quack”.

    But seriously, this robot surgeon still needs a surgeon to chaperone so what’s being gained or saved? It’s just surgery with extra steps. This has the same execution as RoboTaxis (which also have a human onboard for emergencies) and those things are rightly being called a nightmare. What separates this from that?

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    So are we fully abandoning reason based robots?

    Is the future gonna just be things that guess but just keep getting better at guessing?

    I’m disappointed in the future.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI and robotics are coming for the highest paid jobs first. The attack on education is much more sinister than you think. We are approaching an era where many thinking and high cost labor fields will be eliminated. This attack on education is because the plan is to replace it all with AI.

      It is pretty sickening really to think of a world where your AI teacher supplied by Zombie Twitter will teach history lessons to young pupils about whether or not the Holocaust is real. I am not making this shit up.

      This is no longer about wars against nations. This has become the war for the human mind and billionaires just found the cheat code.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it were the only option, I’d gladly take it.

      I rely on robots to do a lot of other things in my life, directly and indirectly.

      Well, not many directly. But machines, definitely.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it’s not like I refuse to drive my car because it wasn’t handcrafted by a human.

        It is an electrical fault on four wheels, but that’s just because it’s old.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They obviously don’t feel comfortable with the robot doing surgery on humans just yet either which is why they’re not actually suggesting doing that yet. It will have to go through years and years of certification before that’s even considered.

      I’m sure most surgeries will still be conducted by humans but there are situations where one of these would be extremely helpful. Any situation where a surgeon isn’t currently accessible and can’t quickly get there. Remote communities, Disaster relief, Arctic research facilities, Starships trapped in the Delta quadrant, War zones, Ships at sea.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Naturally as this kind of thing moves into use on actual people it will be used on the wealthiest and most connected among us in equal measure to us lowly plebs right…right?

    • brown567@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you kidding!? It’ll be rolled out to poor people first! (gotta iron out the last of the bugs somehow)

      • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You really don’t understand modern medical bullshit. The rich will be all over this, just like AI, Just like NFTs just like every bullshit thing that comes up they get roped into by a flashy salesman

        • brown567@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yeah, I’ve been successfully propagandized into thinking rich people became rich through merit, I forgot how many of them are complete morons XD

          Thanks for reminding me

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe we could install a murder mode switch.

            Perhaps an algorithm where its effectiveness is inversely proportionate to your bank account.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “OMG it was supposed to take out my LEFT kidney! I’m gonna die!!!”

    “Oops, the surgeon in the training video took out a Right kidney. Uhh… sorry.”

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    so theoretically they could make sex bots and train them on… so they perform ‘unflappably’!

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    My son’s surgeon told me about the evolution of one particular cardiac procedure. Most of the “good” doctors were laying many stitches in a tight fashion while the “lazy” doctors laid down fewer stitches a bit looser. Turns out that the patients of the “lazy” doctors had a better recovery rate so now that’s the standard procedure.

    Sometimes divergent behaviors can actually lead to better behavior. An AI surgeon that is “lazy” probably wouldn’t exist and engineers would probably stamp out that behavior before it even got to the OR.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s just one case of professional laziness in an entire ocean of medical horror stories caused by the same.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Or more likely they weren’t actually being lazy, they knew they needed to leave room for swelling and healing. The surgeons that did tight stitches thought theirs was better because it looked better immediately after the surgery.

        Surgeons are actually pretty well known for being arrogant, and claiming anyone who doesn’t do their neat and tight stitching is lazy is completely on brand for people like that.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Eliminating room for error, not to say AI is flawless but that is the goal in most cases, is a good way to never learn anything new. I don’t completely dislike this idea but I’m sure it will be driven towards cutting costs, not saving lives.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s ridiculous. Everyone knows that for a robot to perform an operation like this safely, it needs human-written code and a LiDAR.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    See the part that I dont like is that this is a learning algorithm trained on videos of surgeries.

    That’s such a fucking stupid idea. Thats literally so much worse than letting surgeons use robot arms to do surgeries as your primary source of data and making fine tuned adjustments based on visual data in addition to other electromagnetic readings

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah but the training set of videos is probably infinitely larger, and the thing about AI is that if the training set is too small they don’t really work at all. Once you get above a certain data set size they start to become competent.

      After all I assume the people doing this research have already considered that. I doubt they’re reading your comment right now and slapping their foreheads and going damn this random guy on the internet is right, he’s so much more intelligent than us scientists.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Theres no evidence they will ever reach quality output with infinite data, either. In that case, quality matters.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No we don’t know. We are not AI researchers after all. Nonetheless I’m more inclined to defer to experts then you. No offence, (I mean there is some offence, because this is a stupid conversation) but you have no qualifications.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s less of an unknown and more of a “it has never demonstrated any such capability.”

            Btw both OpenAI and Deepmind wrote papers proving their then models would never approach human error rate with infinite training. It correctly predicted performance of ChatGPT4.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If we go by that logic, some worker from your supermarket should be able to do surgeries

    Doctors have to learns this much so they can handle most really unusual stuff, not because they have to know this for a standard surgery.