First, kernel level anti cheat is more akin to a business owner installing very invasive cameras, on your person, and they watch every little thing you do, including going to the bathroom. If they see something they don’t like, you gtfo of their store. Don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t willingly agree to go into a store like that.
Second, in a game like battlefield… Who cares if someone is cheating? It’s not a competitive shooter like CS or Valorant. If someone is cheating, change servers…
If you really care about cheating that much, get a console. Stop giving these companies the okay to install rootkits on your PC.
First up you’re comparing two completely different scales of bad things happening. If someone cheats in a game it doesn’t really meaningfully affect anyone, having your house broken into is a direct threat on your property. Locking a door has minimal downsides but allowing someone who can be trusted less than most corporations to have root access to your entire computer has a pile of risks and opens doors for worse. If anticheat is just to deter cheating then there’s no justification to have more access. If you can’t handle maybe having a match ruined then you shouldn’t be playing online games.
Do you lock your door at night? Why? Anyone could just use a fireman’s axe and open it. Or they could just drive through your living room and steal everything.
For kernel-level anti-cheats its quite simple. Those in opposition to kernel-level anti-cheats likely view locking a door as a small task with minimal downsides, which could reasonably deter an opportunistic criminal, or buy you time to escape with your life or call the police.
They also likely view kernel-level anti-cheats as, for the benefits they provide, having too large of downsides. (providing a third-party company kernel-level access via a closed-source program)
If you’re concerned about privacy just dual boot windows in a separate SSD to play games and use Linux and Graphene OS.
In another thread in this comment section I mention UEFI rootkits and firmware implants (kernel-level access is strong starting point for this). Your solutions do not address these issues, which could be important to someone. (Depending on their threat-model)
deleted by creator
Bootlicker spotted.
deleted by creator
First, kernel level anti cheat is more akin to a business owner installing very invasive cameras, on your person, and they watch every little thing you do, including going to the bathroom. If they see something they don’t like, you gtfo of their store. Don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t willingly agree to go into a store like that.
Second, in a game like battlefield… Who cares if someone is cheating? It’s not a competitive shooter like CS or Valorant. If someone is cheating, change servers…
If you really care about cheating that much, get a console. Stop giving these companies the okay to install rootkits on your PC.
First up you’re comparing two completely different scales of bad things happening. If someone cheats in a game it doesn’t really meaningfully affect anyone, having your house broken into is a direct threat on your property. Locking a door has minimal downsides but allowing someone who can be trusted less than most corporations to have root access to your entire computer has a pile of risks and opens doors for worse. If anticheat is just to deter cheating then there’s no justification to have more access. If you can’t handle maybe having a match ruined then you shouldn’t be playing online games.
For kernel-level anti-cheats its quite simple. Those in opposition to kernel-level anti-cheats likely view locking a door as a small task with minimal downsides, which could reasonably deter an opportunistic criminal, or buy you time to escape with your life or call the police.
They also likely view kernel-level anti-cheats as, for the benefits they provide, having too large of downsides. (providing a third-party company kernel-level access via a closed-source program)
In another thread in this comment section I mention UEFI rootkits and firmware implants (kernel-level access is strong starting point for this). Your solutions do not address these issues, which could be important to someone. (Depending on their threat-model)