• theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is such a garbage take. There is no way to “show our world as it truly is” in two dimensions. I’m all about showing other projects and orientations. Classrooms should have “upside down” maps and Albert maps for example. But we should also teach that each projection has benefits and drawbacks. I was taught that decades ago. Have we stopped?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      29 days ago

      The way the world’s going, the next accepted projection will be depicted on the backs of four elephants atop a turtle.

    • BehavioralClam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Its the same take that’s applied to any party seen as a “status quo”. Your boss, the CEO, police, the state, movies, everything is “projected” to show something that it isn’t to subtly manipulate the basis of your decisions.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        What? Map projections are not projected to manipulate you psychologically. They are projected to manipulate a three dimensional object onto a two dimensional surface.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      29 days ago

      Africans: You know, 14th century mercator maps are horribly disproportionate over 1/2 the map and are the maps of reference for most online apps, software and textbooks. There are better projections that balance location for actual land mass, we should probably use those.

      lemmy: garbage take.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        There aren’t better maps. Only maps with different tradeoffs. ALL 2d maps of spheres are disproportionate.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          29 days ago

          No, there aren’t perfect maps. There ARE better maps.

          Mercator’s one trick is north is always straight up, so it’s great for navigation with a compass. If you’re navigating the oceans on a ship, or even using GPS in your car, Mercator is GOAT because you don’t have to twist it as your drive to keep north up. Unfortunately, we default to Mercator just about everywhere in places where it really has disadvantages.

          If you’re just looking at the map to locate things, or compare countries there are dozens of better maps and our decision to default to mercator for most uses us

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      99% of people dont know that there other projections. I dare you to ask people which map projection is their favorite.

      Ideally yes we should stick to standard and make sure everyone knows thay there are many variants and none of them perfectly represent the sphere were on but thats not happening.

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        29 days ago

        I don’t believe that 99% figure for a second. Unless geography is removed from all curricula worldwide. Even still, that ignorance would not signify what this movement implies. It is a useful map; end of story. If the movement were, “We should increase public knowledge of geography and how projections work,” fine. But it isn’t.