• RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If Google is going to lock down my device to the point where I can’t install apps without their permission, I might as well dump Android and go straight to Apple. I sacrificed my phone being good for the openness of the platform, but if Google loses that openness, why shouldn’t I go with Apple?

    • MrSqueezles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This change requires you to attach your real name when publishing software. That’s all. You can still publish to and install packages from anywhere. This doesn’t come close to Apple’s complete control.

      Google already scans packages you’re installing for malware and alerts you and allows you to install them anyway. This gives that scanner one more tool to identify bad actors.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the cheapest new iPhone is $600 and you can get a cheap new android phone for around $100-$200 and get 6 years of security updates (Galaxy A16 for example)

      If a smartphone is no longer a computer where you can install whatever you want, why bother investing so much money on a very locked-down phone? You can use the hundred of dollars you saved to spend on a small portable PC or something to run any software you want.

      • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah but my banks don’t support my small portable PC, nor does my mobile phone provider. If I wanted a small portable PC I’d get a small portable PC. What I want is a smartphone.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        $600 is pocket change for a phone these days. And for that $600 you’re getting a flagship phone. You couldn’t pay me enough money to put up with a non-flagship. Been there, done that. They’re too slow and frustrating, and apps keep closing due to lack of RAM. Never again. I much rather spend $600-800 on a high-end device that’s a couple of generations old.

        • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A $200 phone in 2015 is not the same as a $200 phone in 2025. I know from experience.

          Those phones in 2015 were awful, but in 2025, they feel more like mid-range phones.

          Edit: And $600 is pocket change? Sound like someone lived a privilaged life.

          • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            This 100%

            I have used tracfone since 2012 and only bought phones from their store, sub $150. The budget phones today are so much better than the last 10 years.

            I just can’t wrap my head around sinking that much into a phone when you replace it every year and it cost as much as a decent budget computer, but worse.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              People who upgrade every year sell their old one at >50% the price.

              So they don’t fork over €600, they only do €250 or so.

          • Psythik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I make $19/hr and live paycheck to paycheck. I’m just being realistic about the current cell phone market.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apple hardware has always been a generation ahead. Even when android/qualcom catches up, next generation is out already. The reason to avoid apple was it being a closed system money grab.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only answer is money at that point. I don’t know how much phones are these days, but aren’t iPhones like $1400, but Android is like $900?

      I may be wrong though. Last time I bought a phone was 2018, and it was $600. Still using it.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can get Android phones with reasonable specs around $200. No need for the so called “flagships”.

      • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I already tend to buy the expensive flagship models of phones. I buy unlocked and it lasts me ~5+ years, so I get the best phone I can get at the time and make it last, so money isn’t as much of an issue if I were to move to an iPhone.