• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    First off, FUCK UBER… but I don’t see Uber being at any sort of fault here unless their policy is no animals, which it obviously isn’t because Uber Pet exists. Only possibly by not routing service animal rides through Uber Pet exclusively since those drivers are already expecting animals.

    Do we really want to say that in order to participate in rideshare driving at all that you must allow animals in your private vehicle?

    Uber drivers use their own vehicles, they are not Uber’s property or responsibility. If an owner doesn’t want animals in their vehicle, they cannot and should not be forced to. A lot of people don’t want animals in their vehicles, trained or not. They may be worried about damage from things like claws to the fabrics, etc. and don’t want to deal with that possibility, whereas the Uber Pet drivers are prepared for that.

    And this doesn’t even get into the bastards that lie about their pets and “emotional support” animals being service animals causing problems for those that actually do need the assistance. There’s no penalty for lying about it, and no verification system to filter those out.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is Uber saying no? Or are drivers cancelling rides when they realize there’s an animal that wasn’t disclosed previously, and they aren’t part of Uber Pets?

        Because there’s a distinct difference there.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          There actually isn’t. Uber is responsible for their contractors and are liable when they fuck up. As they are the ones who hired them.

    • devfuuu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve had my fair share of seeing uber drivers starting conflict when I accompany a blind person with their dog. They deserve it.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see both sides of this. As a blind person myself, I frequently interact with people who have service dogs and such. Hell, at one point in my life, I had a girlfriend who had a service dog because she was deafblind and I have seen her be denied rides in person.

      Every driver who signs up for Uber in the Terms of Service has a thing about having to accept service animals, no matter whether it’s a pet ride or not. It’s just in the account Terms of Service when you create your driver account. If you read them, you will find it.

      So if you absolutely unequivocally do not want service animals in your car, you cannot drive for either of these services.

      I guess you could do like the restaurant deliveries or whatever, but to take passengers, you couldn’t do it.