• MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The problem is the arms race escalates forever - cheat developers will just regroup, analyse what the new VAC is doing, and start finding new exploits.

    Not saying Valve should just give up; quite the opposite. The war never ends.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      That’s not the problem. The problem is people hacking software.

      If we are talking about the software. The problem is the hacking of that software. I replied to a comment about the software.

      The arms race is not the problem. Anti-cheat didn’t come first. The hacking of software did.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Why do you hate property rights?

        I’m not defending cheating in online games or interfering with Valve’s service, but if you think the solution to stopping them is attacking “software hacking” in general as a concept, that juice ain’t worth the squeeze. “Software hacking,” fundamentally, is nothing more than modifying the operation of your computer, your property that you own. It’s no different than buying a physical paper book and then writing notes in the margin.

        If you’re proposing disallowing people from doing that, you’re attacking the concept of property rights itself.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That would be absurd for me to suggest. I was not claiming that all “hacking” no matter how you define the word, as bad.

          I was just stating the source of the problem here. Everyone is really sensitive about the fact.