• Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    The trick is to set a reasonable limit for political assassinations and idiotic massive construction projects ahead of time, and then keep to those limits.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    No because narcissistic psychopathic yes-men would flood my surroundings and I’d probably quickly become paranoid (with reasons to be that).

    Except if it was in a Douglas Addams way.

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s a famous phrase: power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It’s guaranteed to happen. The theme is played upon in LOTR when both Gandalf and Galadriel refuse the ring, knowing what it will do to them. It’s the most important metaphor Tolkien put into the stories for a good reason. Peter Jackson made those moments stand out, as he also understood the assignment. Nobody is capable of resisting the call of corruption when given absolute power. You are not an exception.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think there are many people out there who could.

    To me, the problem isn’t being a benevolent dictator; it’s getting a benevolent person there in a benevolent way.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’d like to think so. When we read 1984 in high school, a friend and I were studying together. I remember saying (in my naïveté), “I loved the book and I get the history but why would you want to be in charge of a place that sucks?” She was like, “You’re just going to have to get used to the fact that a lot of people care about power more than beaches.”

    Well, I still think those people are foolish. I’d rather be in charge of my own tiny slice of paradise than rule over some wack ass dictatorship where everyone else is miserable. Not wanting to be in charge is probably the basic pre-requisite for being a benevolent dictator. I like to cook for people and stuff. I’d use my power and wealth to do that.

    That being said, I’m a dirtbag. I’d have a cool house somewhere with mountain and ocean views. Probably 3 or 4 beauty queens who also have Ms. Congeniality pageant sashes who are in charge of laughing at my jokes and charming me. No more than one or two rhythmic gymnastics teams that delight us all by throwing ribbons to each other with their feet. (Other apparatuses are cool too. Hula hoop. Clubs. Ball. Variety is the spice of life.)

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    With my dictatorial powers … my first action would be to seize and outlaw extreme wealth. No one would be allowed to own more than $1 million.

    All the money collected would be used for government and providing a Universal Basic Income for everyone.

    And I’d get a designer to make me a big fancy hat.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That is increadibly hard to do.

      1. How do you define what goes into that 1 million of allowed wealth? If I buy a house worth 950000, would I only be allowed to save 50000.
      2. what about if the house increase in value so that it is worth 2 million, should I just accept that I loose 1 million? What about stocks?
      3. Inflation or Deflation, when/how will you update that limit?
      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d do the same but at 1b. And then execute anyone that steps over 1B. It’s incredibly easy to not be a billionaire.

      • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is a delight, and you are correct. That said, in the spirit of this silly thread, I provide solutions, below:

        If I buy a house worth 950000, would I only be allowed to save 50000.

        Yes. It will be time to get some roommates.

        1. what about if the house increase in value so that it is worth 2 million, should I just accept that I loose 1 million?

        Yes. Or rather, exactly half of the house. Time to rent a storage unit, and put up some tarps to divide the entryway.

        What about stocks?

        Better sell some.

        Inflation or Deflation, when/how will you update that limit?

        Cost of living increases have long been understood and easy enough to calculate.

        But - when I’m global leader, COLA for millionaires will only start after exactly as many years as the local minimum wage went without updates.

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I would probably also include the wealth one owns and not just money (because thats useless, they would just use a different currency) and set it to like 40-50 houses in value. If they own a company that gets bigger the country gets shares

        50 Houses might seem a lot in value (especially depending on what kind of building) but it already would distribute a lot of wealth + allowing the dream of being filthy rich with less consequences to the rest of the population

        Because its just an idea i dont think about the specifics of the exact limit and such

      • Mike@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If you’re a dictator, surely you don’t have to justify any of your actions and just do whatever you want, right?

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You absolutely has to justify your actions, you will only be in power as long as your subordinates will follow your orders.

          You can’t just do whatever you want, you need to have a strategy, now doing this dictator stuff right will give you insane levels of power, but you can’t just go crazy and boss everyone around from the get go, you need to reward your loyal subjects and create levels of privilege and harsh punishments for the people to enjoy and stay loyal.

  • vin@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t think most dictators think that they’re evil. So even if I say I’m not or won’t be, it’s meaningless. History will be the judge.

  • 001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m less worried about getting corrupted and turning evil, and more about having the powerful people of the country/world go after me with all their might after I declare a transition into anarchism/socialism.

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you’re offering me the job, I’ll give it a go. I think I’d do a shockingly great job, but even if I didn’t, there is no universe where I’m as evil and incompetent as the people who are currently in charge.

  • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’d like to think I wouldn’t, but my chances probably aren’t any better than the average person. I don’t think I’d ever get anywhere near the worst leaders in history, but I wouldn’t count on me being perfectly incorruptible.

    But even if I was, that wouldn’t be enough. Either I’d have to run the entire government myself, which is impossible, or I’d have to reliably find other incorruptible people to work for me and replace me when I die, which will never be reliable enough. If I didn’t find incorruptible people, what’s to stop them getting bribed into not letting me do anything until I let the corrupt people have their way?

    • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Corruption is easy to solve. Legalize offering bribes. Pay a large reward to anyone that can prove a bribe was accepted. Execute anyone that accepts bribes.