• 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    HDMI is the proprietary monopoly scam. It is added to devices by the owning members of the scam. Display Port is the open source free equivalent standard that the educated consumer goes looking for.

    • Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you, I did find myself thinking theres a reason why I have the DP cables for my PC monitors which don’t seem to have an issue running high resolutions… But then I’m not running 8k on anything so I wasn’t really sure about that

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Got any of that juicy 8k content?

    No? Because noone does and noone cares.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are 8K cameras, but the only reason to use them is to create stabilized 4K content.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They are also important for VR content. You need a lot of pixels to fill someone’s Field of View.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are a few broadcast 8k channels in Japan and South Korea. There’s some YouTube 8k videos and 16k is being worked on. 8k is pretty awesome, though I really just want 8k screens for large PC monitors. I currently use a 4k 43” and 8k would be even better at that distance. Both Samsung and Sony have 8k screens for sale right now and they’re not really that crazy expensive for cutting edge. (75” Samsung 8k QLED for $3k)

  • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    My next TV purchase will be based on which models have Display Port.

    …And which don’t have smart features, but that’s a given.

      • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        The transformation into crochety old man is complete. This AI being shoehorned into everything can get off my damn lawn too.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is different from the old man angry at change meme. The change isn’t the problem; personally I like change and seeing evolutionary and revolutionary improvements.

          The problem is that so many of these changes are for the benefit of the corporations involved in the product at the expense of anyone who ends up using it or is near enough to be affected collaterally.

          The idea of a smart TV is nice. Except they put the underpowered hardware in it that struggles to display a menu. Maybe because of all the data it is gathering and sending home or the time it spends making sure the latest ads are downloaded.

          Smart appliances are also a nice idea. Except most just want to connect to some proprietary web service so they can middle man every interaction to sell your data or a subscription.

          A smart car also sounds cool. Except they are also designed to just make more money either via more expensive repairs, possibly even forced to go through a manufacturer approved mechanic because they use security features to protect them from competition, or by the usual selling your data and ads. Oh and also they can save money by sticking a bunch of controls into the software and not needing to make physical buttons. Also they save even more by also using underpowered hardware and probably not even bothering with UX design. Maybe even deliberately because bad experiences can be upsellers. Oh they also want to sell subscriptions to whatever they can, including to things that don’t even benefit from going through their services.

          It’s all just rent seeking.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I got a new Android TV for offline use. Most people say you get an OK experience if you don’t connect the TV into a network.

      The biggest remaining annoyance is that it takes 45 seconds to cold-start. Almost as if it’s booting an OS desgined for a phone or something.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s just a commercial display. Most commercial displays don’t have an OS and require a separate device for showing video like an Nvidia Shield, PC, etc.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mine would be as well, but tbh I don’t love the kodi UI. At least I didn’t a few years ago when I tried it.

      Maybe Nvidia will drop a new shield with DP support, but not going to hold my breath on that

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      No TVs have DP, and the largest monitors you can find now are below 55". I wish you luck.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    I couldn’t care less about 8k since I can’t even see streaming 4k content without using a platform infested with DRM.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just for the record, the HDMI consortium can place their mouths on my genitals and consume my waste

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The HDMI standard needs to declare cable bankruptcy and start over with a new port design. We all have way too many HDMI cables supporting 23 years of standards. There is nothing in the specification to clearly label, across brands, what type of hdmi specification is supported by the cable or port.

    Also, the DRM baked into the specification is such bullshit.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      They need to switch to fiber optic or a simple coaxial cable (like SDI) with BNC connectors. That would end this madness with long cables being outrageous, and the connectors being flimsy.

      They also need to separate audio back out into its own thing.

  • gerbler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    A buddy of mine worked in a theatre and told me that the film’s were all 1080P. I called bullshit. Those screens were huge they were clearly 4K. He showed me the reel and yup he was right.

    If theatres don’t even bother with 4K, your TV doesn’t need 8K.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    “…whenever we have 8K TVs and content.”

    The TVs exist, but there won’t be content for years and years. Companies barely stream usable 4K right now.

  • Jestzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Good thing the word Premium® is there to let me know it’s a high quality product!

  • baatliwala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I doubt the general public cares about or can even tell the difference from 4k to 8k. Not to mention the amount of bandwidth that will be required.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      This exaxt comment could have been for 1080 to 4K. That said 4k has had a lot less fanfare to HD.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Not really.

        • like I said bandwidth required is insanely high, 4k movies are around 30-60 gb (for download not streaming). Extrapolate that to 8k, and a TV series? No one is going to reserve potentially 500gb to 1TB for a TV series in 8k for local download
        • phones especially mid rangers are still somewhat struggling with watching 4k content if it is local, not to mention even 4k is useless for the screen size of a phone. Every thing is mobile driven these days in terms of design.
        • 8k is not going to be worth for monitors because of their size
        • Top of the line graphic cards still cannot max out the latest games at 4k60, how can they achieve 8k? Not to mention the power draw will be higher.

        Sorry but no way native 8k is going mainstream any time soon. 4k is genuinely better looking over 1080p but 8k to 4k is not much of a difference for the relative increase in requirements.

        • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Top of the line graphic cards still cannot max out the latest games at 4k60, how can they achieve 8k?

          Top graphic cards will always be catching up to the latest games. Software is developing much much quicker than hardware.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I really don’t know a movie the cinematographic virtues of which were better seen in 4k as compared to 1080. Colors’ quality, refresh rates - maybe, but the amount of pixels? You see a square 1080 pixels tall, 1920 pixels wide. How the hell are you going to discern a group of 2 or 3 pixels in that, let alone a separate pixel (I’m aware it’s in fact a group of 3 colored ones)? Even if you will, what will it change in your perception of the movie, which detail?

        Apple users sometimes boast how fonts look nicer on their screens, but IRL I haven’t seen much difference with a glossy screen of worse resolution.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I expect the content delivery companies to do something stupid again with 8k (like when they rolled out 4K), and totally nerf the bitrate and encoding quality, making it look worse than a properly encoded high bitrate 720p/1080p file.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah but there will always be freaks like me who need to sit less than 2m away from a massive 75" screen so that they can browse the desktop at 4K without increasing display scaling beyond 100%.

      Needless to say, I could benefit from 8K.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be clear it will “require” a new cable to push at that max (8k/120fps?)

    It’s not like you need a new cable just because a new TV supports it.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You kinda do though. It’s like the difference between Cat5 / Cat5e / Cat6. Physically they all have the same Pin outs, but the tolerances vary greatly. Could you get 10Gbps on Cat5? Possibly, but only over short clean distances. You can do it more easily on Cat6, even though they all plug in together. The HDMI cables are the same way.