• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Calling Tencent a “web and gaming giant” is really deceiving here.

    It’s one of the biggest tech conglomerates in the world. Tencent invest into literally everything: games, social networks, entertainments, cloud computing, finance, AI, other investments… Tencent owns WeChat, Tencent Cloud, Tencent Healthcare just to name a few and helps CCP with surveilance and censorship through these ownings (tbf they don’t really have a choice, they’re based in China)

    100% they are involved in military too so this classification is very much justified.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s horrible. I should Google for more information so I can avoid using companies involved with the military.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      More likely they would leave the market. That game isn’t really popular in NA but it’s the most popular non-mobile game in Asia

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        …Are you kidding? LoL has been huge for years in NA. RIOT is an American company that was bought by Tencent. Leaving the market means they lose their entire dev team.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          RIOT is an American company that was bought by Tencent.

          Sure but it ignores that Tencent gave $20 million to create LoL (first 10 then another 10 to buy out the other investors)

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Investing 2 years after the game was first playable by the public counts as “giving money to create it”, now? That’s at least 6 years after they’d have started development.

            You’ve ignored reality.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              They invested before it was released, what are you talking about?

              Tencent paid for it to be made

              Edit: upon research you are talking about when Tencent became the owner. Not their investments to have the game made.

              Not mentioned in a Washington Post article but

              “ Over the summer of 2008, Merrill and Beck’s work seeking funds proved fruitful and the two landed $7 million more in funding from Benchmark and FirstMark Capital venture capital firms.”

              /+ 10 mill from Tencent and prior to launch Tencent gave another 10 mill to buy out those investors

              • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                You’re probably thinking the “full release” but the game was being played by the public for several years, and was quite popular for over year prior to the “official release”. So, no. They didn’t. Their investment came a full year after I’d already been playing the game.

                The game was made already. They bought an existing product.

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 hours ago

                  I can’t find anything suggesting the game was released prior to 2008

                  Riot released some video at sometime talking about how they had to cram to make the game even playable prior to the sales pitch so I really doubt it was made before that

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Never was that popular

          COD and Fortnite are much bigger with the latter even making sports radio talk

          The popularity spike was when MLG needed to fill in the Halo Reach spot due to that game’s lack of appeal

          • eronth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            There’s not way you can say that game wasn’t ever popular. Maybe it’s never been the literal most popular, but it’s definitely had a life as a majorly popular game. Large streaming views, tons of players, etc. I have no idea how it’s doing now, but it definitely had a number of years of major popularity.

          • Baguette@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            What? League is consistently the top result of twitch. Even accounting for other regions, league is by far one of the largest games people watch in na. Big na streamers pull in thousands of viewers (doublelift, tyler1 for example)

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You can listen to Riot themselves

              They aren’t bringing in new players, their playerbase is just getting older

              Which explains why they’ve made it less mechanical demanding and more about positioning over the years

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gosh I feel like I’ve heard Tencent has a stake in some other company that isn’t mentioned here yet.

    what was it . . . hmmmmm

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have a puppet coming into the presidency. China will have all the inroads to our government they care to pay for. Tencent and Co. will be a non-issue.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      As opposed to all of our previous presidents, who refused to be bought by corporate corruption? LoL.

  • punseye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol pretty much every American company should be added to a similar list given how deep they are in the pockets of CIA, etc

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Cool whataboutism, this article is about a Chinese company and China, not about America or its mil companies.

      It’s not like it’s an insult to say Tencent is involved with the Chinese military, why are you so defensive? Do you think you’re sharing unknown info? I think we’re all quite aware of the US MIC.

      Do you seriously believe China and every other country doesn’t keep similar lists already? This is basic ass shit.

      Every time anything about China is posted someone like you comes running to tell us all “b-b-but America too!!!” as if that changes a damn thing in regards to the discussion topic at hand.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pointing out hypocrisy is not whataboutism. Whataboutism is when you bring up a separate topic as a criticism to distract from the original topic. For example, if you make fun of my cooking and I bring up your drawing skills in response, that’s whataboutism. If you suck at cooking and yet bring up me sucking at cooking, that’s just pointing fingers and trying to paint that as a negative for someone else when you possess the same deficiency.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Imo whataboutism is not even a real thing.
          That’s just a dumb label made up for use against ussr it was just never intended to be used against US lol. But pointing out that ur opponent has ulterior motives is properly legal

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            True, and maybe I’m playing a losing game by arguing within that context, but I did want to point out that even under those conditions the “logical fallacy” doesn’t fit.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re getting downvoted for an unrelated comment not because they don’t believe America has companies that contribute to their mil industrial complex.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      hence why this article is not a big deal or dig at China in any way lmao

      Why does everything need to be whataboutism’d to America. Yes we also have companies that work with our military, who gives a fuck? This article is simply pointing out that a big Chinese company with ties to lots of social media (Reddit for example) is also mil adjacent.

      It’s just a fact, not commentary on China that then makes the US hypocritical.

      Why are you making whataboutist comments unrelated to the article? Every fucking country has companies that work with their military, that’s not what the article is about.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m just pointing it out bro, nothing more bro, just mentioning it bro, nothing wrong with constantly running negative stories about China bro, not manufacturing anything bro.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t know which company you’re referring to, but I think it’s pretty damn likely that China also classifies them as a military company too.

      I fail to see the hypocrisy that you appear to be implying.