It’s pretty easy to see the problem here: The Internet is brimming with misinformation, and most large language models are trained on a massive body of text obtained from the Internet.
Ideally, having substantially higher volumes of accurate information might overwhelm the lies. But is that really the case? A new study by researchers at New York University examines how much medical information can be included in a large language model (LLM) training set before it spits out inaccurate answers. While the study doesn’t identify a lower bound, it does show that by the time misinformation accounts for 0.001 percent of the training data, the resulting LLM is compromised.
Even curation seems unlikely to fix the problem. I bet a new algorithm is required that allows LLMs to validate their response before it’s returned. Basically an “inner monologue” to avoid saying stupid things.
I could use one of those…
These models are so shit they need a translator. Hilarious.