• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    Man, real countries are doing this shit while the US is doing an illegal war on the thought crime of being"woke".

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      China has this covered hands down. If you say Winnie, two mean looking Chinese men appear behind you.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not just this, I’m not sure if they checked about LGBT rights in China.

        From outside the first world Trump and his supporters look scandalist, loud, corrupt and incompetent. Which is sad. But they don’t seem fascist most of the time.

        Anyway, if we take Putin, he’s done many things, one thing he’s consistently never done is say antisemitic or easily recognizable fascist things. There is some popularity of Ivan Ilyin around him, who is a Russian emigrant fascist philosopher, though (who apparently wanted to fix problems with Mussolini and the own such “thinkers” of the White movement, except he was on the dumber side, so compared to his writings Mein Kampf seems intellectually elegant).

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Even the most evil people can have good moments and we can appreciate those without changing outlet overall opinion.

          I’m still waiting for Trump’s good moment

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            My point was - people may have consistency in words and actions, but not between words and actions.

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    There’s a bunch of places in the US that has 10 Gbps speed, so this jump to 50 Gbps is not too shocking. Writing it as 50,000 Mbps to make it seem huge is an interesting take.

    • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s so incredibly annoying when people use smaller order of magnitude descriptors simply so they can then write more zeros. A good chunk of the time too it feels like it’s done to distract from a different point or to exaggerate without technically lying.

      Doesn’t help that technical jargon is only best used when communicating with someone in that field or understands it. Big number + alphabet soup always seems scary 😞

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’m just pretty sure my fiber vendor offers 10Gbps service but I’ve never had reason to check whether they offer it here. There app is not responding so I can’t verify …. They are better at fiber service than maintaining an app.

      Personally I think gig fiber is the current sweet spot:

      • price has come down a lot
      • very low latency
      • high reliability
      • more than enough for most people

      It’s technically overkill for most people but a huge benefit is it works. For everything. Cable tends to be way over-provisioned for plus asymmetrical and higher latency, so you won’t get the bandwidth you pay for, uploads will be slow, and latency may hit you while gaming or streaming. Most of the time cable or slower fiber will be good enough but you will hit glitches, buffering. My gigabit fiber has been rock solid for years, never a glitch, never a buffering, no slow uploads, never impacts gaming. It’s near perfect. I dont mind the extra cost due to the huge savings from dropping cable and phone

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It will be in 10 years when a majority of their country has access to it. Industrialization in China is on a different level.

      In less than 25 years they will take the top spot for global economy, and likely everything else.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yep, and in ten years, we’ll still be arguing about whether dsl counts as “broadband”

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        China will be lucky if they still exist as a single unified nation. Demographics, employment, debt, over built property market, over dependence on manufacturing exports, energy import dependence, food import dependence.

        They have a number of very strong headwinds that could very well cause the failure and break up of the CCP in the next twenty years.

        • Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Have you ever stepped food into China? I have. And I can tell you from personal experience they’re living in the future.

          They have their own fair share of problems. But the investments they’re making into infrastructure are very easily going to catapult them to the head of the class here very shortly…

          I’m really tired of being told how distopian China is from people who’ve never even been there.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            We’ll be around. We may not be a democracy but we’ll be around.

            China though, it’s cooked .

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Worse than that, from the article:

      The 50G-PON ITU-T standard supports theoretical speeds of up to 50 Gbps downstream and up to 25 Gbps upstream, though current real-world deployments in China - led by China Telecom, its regional branch Shanghai Telecom, and ZTE - typically provide 10 Gbps all-optical access.

      So the 50G number is just theoretical and actual real world speed is only 10G. Due to regulations in the US, advertisements would need to advertise the real speeds. So this is really just the same as 10Gbps anywhere else.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Meanwhile, Telia in Estonia: “The Estonian customer doesn’t prioritize connection speed or price, that’s why we don’t need to offer competitive speed/price ratios compared to what we have in other European countries”

    • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seems surprising, especially because Estonia is known for its digitized government. I logically thought that it’d be complemented with decent Internet coverage.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        We have roughly the same problem that the US has, where they’ve paid the big ISPs to put fiber everywhere and all that money got pocketed. Well, Estonia’s first few big fiber projects were all through Telia. Telia put down way less fiber than promised and constantly kept saying the lines were already all committed so they couldn’t rent it out to competitors.

        This I believe started before we even had Telia here - We had Eesti Telekom, later known as Elion, and then finally it was acquired by Telia. The same company has had a semi-monopolistic status pretty much all the time. Tele2 and Elisa exist, but they’ve never had the sweet ass contracts Telia’s always had.

        This is slowly starting to change with the currently ongoing broadband project where you can get an ISP-neutral fiber connection installed for like 99€ or 199€, regardless of how much work it is to get the lines to you, but I’m not sure this is even available if you’ve already got Telia’s monopoly fiber installed. It’s very slow to roll out and every year or 2 they choose a bunch of municipalities with problematic Internet access and then if you live in one of those, you can apply. This has been a godsend, because it got me fiber at home, after years of only being able to get 12/1 mbps through Telia copper.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Decades ago…

      “Why do I need electricity? I have candles. Lights seem excessive.”

      Yes, but once most people have electricity, new products will be designed to take advantage of it. Now you can have a washing machine, for example.

      Broadband is the same. Once most of your population has high bandwidth, we can start to design things that will use it. Right now we’re still designing for DSL speeds.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          China morally bankrupt and developing at a staggering pace which has somewhat stymied as their scoffing at regulations in favor of backroom dealings is kneecapping themselves.

          So if you zoom in close enough, like looking at this amazingly fast reported internet speed and only at this speed, China “good.”

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          China is a totalitarian regime with more human right, continuing atrocities, corruption, and illegal trade/business practices.

          They are also

          • bringing a billion people out of poverty and up to modern standards of living in record pace
          • building out renewable energy faster than the rest of the world combined
          • have like 95% of the worlds EV buses
          • are adopting EVs at record pace
          • built out the worlds largest high speed rail at record pace
          • publish the most scientific paper of any country
          • are a hotbed of innovation, manufacturing development
          • are quickly building an outstanding space program from almost nothing

          Those accomplishments and many more can be celebrated with losing sight of the basic horribleness of their government

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        So I’m just going to be a completely different person once I have access to these speeds or you are suggesting new tech that will be made available to consumers?

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          The second one.

          Think back to when you were on dial-up. The concept of a streaming movie service would have been a fantasyland. No one was creating one. The infrastructure wasn’t there. It was impossible.

          As soon as people started getting broadband, and enough people got it, streaming services could exist.

          Are you different? No, you just want to watch a movie. But now you don’t have to go to Blockbuster.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      For me, the normal stuff. Mathematically my gig fiber is overkill for my usage. And internet services can rarely keep up with that - you want to download some update or new game? It’s throttled at the source regardless of your internet connection

      But in reality when I visit people with “fast enough” internet, I always see glitches and buffering and lag. While it usually serves the need and sometimes gets advertised bandwidth, gig fiber always serves the need. I shouldn’t have to complain about my network or worry about how many streams or how big a download or how many people on their phones. I should never worry about lag during games or interrupted video calls. And I shouldn’t have to worry about sketchy broadband providers (like xFinity/ConCast) way over provisioning their lines or otherwise never delivering marketed bandwidth.

      Gig fiber delivers. Always. Like any good infrastructure you don’t even have to think about it: it just always does the job

      But computers are getting faster - it seems like even medium level laptops are coming with 2.5Ge, and everything is more and more digital, and we expect more all the time. Yes I do expect to want a faster connection within 5-10 years even without doing anything high bandwidth. Heck, if history holds, another couple upgrades of JavaScript and we’ll need 50G to load web pages

    • wabafee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s not fast it’s more of more bandwidth, means more people can be connected from one line. Speed will remain the same.

  • synicalx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Very cool and they should keep doing this, but no one’s CPE is going to be able to do anywhere near this speed unless they plan on giving everyone large enterprises routers for home use.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re just building out an infrastructure to modern standards rather than half-ass it and have to come back later. You could argue that this is a long term investment where they are saving money by starting with the latest hardware

      • Professorozone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Wish we could do that. But now that I think about it, it’s much better to improve things in small steps that can be monetized with ever increasing prices for each step. Yeah, that’s definitely the better way to do it.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is China leading the world in green energy research and production an evil plot too?

      I get it dictators are shit and we should kill them, but having a society where people’s needs are met makes society easier to control. It’s literally good for the CCP to make people’s lives better so they don’t get hung.

  • diffusive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Written in Switzerland from my 25GBps symmetric connection (for like 60$/month) that I have for a couple of years 🤷‍♂️

    Also for personal use the difference between 1Gbps and 25 (or, I guess, 100GBps) is essentially zero… your everyday connection is via WiFi (good luck to get more than 1GBps there) or on a home server/NAS/workstation where likely you run batch jobs where the difference between 1 minute or 5 minutes is not a huge deal (and yes I am not saying 1 vs 25 because at that speed generally the bottleneck is the place where you are getting data from)

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have a 40Mbps down, 5Mbps up connection for $30. Consider yourself as real lucky.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, I was on that until the other week, when my area finally got upgraded to 1Gbps.

        It’s nice for big downloads (and with game sizes what they are now, that bit is a big difference), but for regular use? Not really a vast change. It’s nice that your bandwidth doesn’t suddenly vanish when one of your unattended devices decides to wake up and download a 20GB update for a game you haven’t played in months I guess.

        • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think you’ve misread my comment or there is some misunderstanding.

          Just in case, it’s a misread, my speed is 40 Mega bit per second - not 40 mega byte per second.

          I have to choose what I want to do and do those things with consideration, otherwise things like streaming will buffer a lot.

          If you thought I said 40MBps, then I’d agree, as i imagine the difference between 320Mbps and 1Gbps won’t be noticed unless you’re timing large downloads.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah, I know. I was on 30Mbps. Took like 5 minutes to download a gigabyte. Now it takes around 10 seconds.

            But most video streaming sites are well below that, and web pages are a few MB tops. The only noticeable difference is when doing larger downloads.

            • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              You and I have completely different views and experiences on this, as I don’t agree with your statement at all; which is why I think you’ve misunderstood.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not to mention the server is the bottleneck at that point. I have access to 2.5Gb/2.5Gb but only pay for 500/500 because, even that is faster than most servers, and of course all the mobile devices aren’t pushing more than 400 on WiFi.

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I have symmetrical 10 Gbps at home ($30/mo) and I’ll agree. When it’s nice when you have big updates, for most households 1 Gbps is going to be just fine. As you say, the vast majority of users are bottlenecked by Wi-Fi.

      The bigger crime are all the asymmetrical connections that people on technologies like Cable TV networks have, where you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up. This results in crappy video calls, makes off-site/remote backups unfeasible, means you can’t host anything at home, etc.

      • imouto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up

        That’s exactly what you get in Australia, even if you have FTTP, 95% of ISPs only offer up to 1000/50Mbps, and that’s if you live in the big cities. Mine costs ~US$70/mo btw. And they have a ‘typical evening speed’ that drops to 860/42Mbps (I’ve never heard of such a concept outside Australia. Yeah, totally not a scam).

        A handful ISPs offer 1000/400Mbps and you’ll be looking at ~US$125/mo. Anything faster you’ll be handed with astronomical commercial bills.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plus what consumer can even support higher bandwidth? Computers are starting to come with 2.5G Ethernet, switches are coming down in price but still pretty expensive for home use (and complex), and any existing wiring is likely close to topped out.

      For anything faster, you’re all too likely to need enterprise equipment for a lot more money and a lot more complexity.

      I’ve briefly considered updating to faster internet but

      • I don’t have a rational need
      • I’d have to replace switches and wiring
      • I don’t have the time to commit
      • even building a file server that can sustain that bandwidth is a challenge
    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seconding this, while I have the option for multi-gig at my address, I don’t have the need, once you get around gigabit upload speeds life is fine.

      I can upload hours of uncompressed gameplay to YouTube in under an hour, and that’s limited mostly by their ingest speeds (≈300Mbps) and not my end, so that’s plenty.

      With all that said, the option for consumers is great, I’m thankful I have that choice, wish more people had it too.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    AT&T still hasn’t installed fiber in my old neighborhood where one of their lines cuts straight through a row of houses that conveniently do get fiber, while everyone else is stuck on cable.

    Did I mention they received billions in federal funding to upgrade everyone?

    • Aimeeloulm@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I live in London and my speed is 64-69Mb, only two choices of BT/Openreach or Virgin Media where I live sadly. I have thought about switching to VM as they seem more stable where I live now, I do check other fibre options like Community Fibre, Hyperoptics and YouFibre regularly to see 8f in my area, sadly not yet :o(

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Virgin will definitely be faster, they’ll do up to a gigabit. Hopefully open reach rolls out fibre to you soon. I only got the fibre to my house last month!

        • Aimeeloulm@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Ty, yeah I have spoken to some neighbours who have Virgin now and they seem quite happy with it, so it looks a good choice to me, through I would see about modem mode with the VM hub as I prefer my own network equipment and hate using ISP ones, currently looking at pfsense or opnsense soon, so hope works well with VM hub :o/

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yup most of the hubs can do modem mode so you should be fine there. I believe their FTTP Hub can’t do it but that’s not in many areas.