The current hostile corporate takeover in the USA and the clear loss of political power of the common people, I started wondering what happened if people used consumption as their leverage. Since the system is designed for continuous growth, what would happen if a mass movement of people stopping buying new non-essential consumer goods?

It would send a much stronger message than angry public protests. Thoughts?

Edit 1: Received some fantastic responses one of these highlighted February 28th as the “National No Spend Day” that we can consider the rehearsal.

*Do not make any purchases Do not shop online, or in-store, No Amazon, No Walmart, No Best Buy, Nowhere!

Do not spend money on: Fast Food,Gas,Major Retailers Do not use Credit or Debit Cards for non essential spending

WHAT YOU CAN DO: Only buy essentials of absolutely necessary (Food, Medicine, Emergency Supplies) If you must spend, ONLY support small, local businesses.*

This movement is the definition of equitable, not spending means everybody can contribute within their means, and if you can’t afford to buy shit anyway, you’re already doing your part!

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2025/02/12/national-no-spend-day-economic-blackout-amazon-walmart/78410711007/

  • irelephant 🍭@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The main problem with these things is people buying stuff before, so they can boycott the next day. Makes absolutely no difference.

    Obviously, what you’re describing is different.

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      agree. the main idea is to shift away from buying new to buying used, bartering, using cash. there’s such abundance of used goods in the US people actually wouldn’t have to compromise their lifestyles and this could continue on for months and months and months.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Im already trying my best to move off any services tied to any oligarch at Trumps inauguration.

    I just bought a kindle but planning on donating it and moving to Kobo.

    Side hobby to learn to pirate safely. Im now using any alternate website to Amazon.

    We have the power of voice with our wallets.

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The Day the World Stops Shoppong examined this and found that it doesn’t take a whole lot of concerted action to tank the consumption economy.

    Buy nothing days are good but less good if you return to regular habits and redouble your consumption after the boycott is over.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I already have. Long before the threat of tariffs. I shop thrift stores, yard sales, and social media markets. I go to electronics recyclers and find perfectly good laptops that just need an OS installed.

    I’ve had the same phone since 2017, and the same car for 10+ years, neither of which were new when I got them.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’ve already planned with my wider family that for the next 4 years we aren’t doing jack shit for holidays. No black friday (tbh we never did anyway), no cyber Monday. No gifts for Christmas.

    • ehpolitical@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I haven’t celebrated xmas for several years now and it’s seriously been so liberating.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I already barely buy shit. I’ve always said “if the economy hinged on my purchasing habit, the country would go bankrupt”. People in general should start living within their means without any protest. It’s good for everyone and also will make corporations slow down on killing this planet.

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I already barely buy shit. I’ve always said “if the economy hinged on my purchasing habit, the country would go bankrupt”.

      well, you’re already part of the movement:)

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If even a relatively small number — say 10-20% — just refused to buy anything other than the bare essentials (like food, energy, utils) until action was taken, you’d probably see more action than if those people got out in the streets and protested.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you got a substantial amount of people to it, like 40-50% of the population it would probably collapse the economy via domino effect. So much is underpinned on people spending money on any given day

    But, I don’t see it happening in reality, just getting 20% to actually do it would be a massive undertaking and 20% would probably be painful, but not cause a cool cascade of collapse

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Total collapse might not be required for real, tangible change. Collective action is a unifying force, and it would remind everyone top to bottom that the house of cards is in fact collapsible and not an inevitable behemoth under its own inertia.

      You could argue that even with reforms the underpinning economic system remains as problematic as ever. But building that collective support, reminding poor voters that they’re not temporarily embarrassed billionaires, adds more opposition to it than support.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They’ll just buy the things they didn’t buy before hand, or afterwards, washing it all out in the average.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      After a long enough period of striking it begins to have repercussions beyond the individual budget.

      If the flow of money slowed to a crawl for an extended period, companies don’t have the funds to pay workers. Enough job loss leads to further reduced spending, thus impacting stock value, thus impacting employment, etc…

      A month would have a noticeable impact, but a full fiscal quarter would be the first cliff where the big corporations would really sweat. But generally I agree, an economic strike with an end date is like an overnight hunger strike

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m sure this will be an unpopular opinion, but any publicly traded company no longer needs to post a profit. Boomers are retiring and 401ks ensure that these companies will make money purely from “value potential”. Maybe in 20 or so years as the demographics change this will be different, but this is how I see it going down today.

    If all of America collectively decided not to purchase from publicly traded companies, and instead only bought from small local companies for just one month. I doubt it would even register on a YTD stock price chart. It would need to be a true philosophical change in how we consume products, and it would have to last for longer than a month to be effective. On top of that, only privileged households will realistically be able to “choose” not to buy consumer goods.

    I think we should all buy less and be more mindful of where our money goes. I think we should buy locally and promote businesses that you agree with on levels beyond the value of the good or services they offer as often as possible. However, I don’t think we can effectively protest this way unless it was a true lifestyle change for a large portion of the country.

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      should all buy less and be more mindful of where our money goes. I think we should buy locally and promote businesses that you agree with on levels beyond the value of the good or services they offer as often as possible. However, I don’t think we can effectively protest this way unless it was a true lifestyle change for a large portion of the country.

      I’d disagree, we saw it with COVID how vulnerable corporations are. They’ll always focus on stock buybacks and stuff like that over recession-proofing. Also, this is quite an equitable movement. Those who can’t afford new shit are already contributing to it.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Firstly, the covid pandemic was a multi year event. Secondly, publicly traded companies were enriched greatly from that time. Also it wasn’t conscious degrowth or a lack of ability, it was supply chain issues that caused products not to be available for purchase.

        • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Firstly, the covid pandemic was a multi year event.

          The initial shocks happened in the first 3 months.

          Secondly, publicly traded companies were enriched greatly from that time. Also it wasn’t conscious degrowth or a lack of ability, it was supply chain issues that caused products not to be available for purchase.

          Yup, that’s why the control here is in the consumers’ hand and again, it’s sort of like reducing your consumption so it starts hitting the metrics enough for corporations to realize the risks.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Both. Definitely both. Every person has a unique capacity for resistance, so however you’re able is good and important. Talking about it, protesting, boycotting (even in tiny amounts) is something! Being nice to yourself and others in non-consumerist ways is also resistance; like hand-write a note instead of buying a card; your loved one will still appreciate it.

    The point is to be a dandelion - they try to pave over us, and we pop back up through the cracks, even in our own little unassuming ways. We may be ants to them but insects outnumber vertebrate life forms by orders of magnitude.

    Lots of metaphors as I get sidetracked but case in point: if you can do it, do it!

    ETA: Decentralized forms of resistance may be our best bet. Big coordinated efforts are good. Making them play whack-a-mole is also good. If they don’t know where to look next even better.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Won’t happen but it’s a great idea. The environment loves recession. The only years in recent history when the climate indicators briefly stopped moving in the wrong direction were 2009 and 2020.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      OH THANK GOD they finally stopped exploiting me. Let me just catch my breath here and oh GOD OH FU–

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    You see this (or used to, anyway) from time to time with gas strikes.

    If it’s just a month of “don’t buy,” it wouldn’t do much in the long run. All that does is time-shift demand to when the strike is over. If the company can anticipate well enough, they’d raise prices when the demand comes back and come out ahead in the long run.

    You have to use/consume less, and for an extended time period, not just change when that purchase happens.

    But yes, with that caveat, use less, and choose the lesser evil when you do need to buy something. The individual effect is small, but small things add up.

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      n the strike is over. If the company can anticipate well enough, they’d raise prices when the demand comes back and come out ahead in the long run.

      You have to use/consume less, and for an extended time period, not just change when that purchase happens.

      But yes, with that caveat, use less, and choose the lesser evil when you do need to buy something. The individual effect is small, but small things add up.

      The mitigation is to focus on used goods so it is much less painful. Unlike gas, people don’t need that new TV, or that next phone, gaming console, their Nth streaming sub and use alternative (wink) ways to consume entertainment media.