• Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel like scientists should move towards open source solutions … I feel like most scientists are smart enough to launch a mastodon server, but well.

    • moe93@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It costs time and money. The handful of times I published articles in an open access journal, I had to pay close to $5K USD per publication.

      Theoretically, researchers can publish on Mastodon or something similar but that unfortunately won’t give us the reach we need. That might be fine with well established names, but for dumb-dumbs like myself who are still trying to make a name for ourselves in our field, we want the highest impact publisher we can find. Those typically come with a price tag.

      Sometimes the grant also dictates acceptable publishers where you can submit your manuscript.

      Sadly, it’s not as easy as it sounds.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Being a scientist kinda means to me you’re able to follow a very easy to understand guide to install mastodon on …

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      while I agree, the reality of the situation is that when you get down to comparing feature to feature, open source solutions tend to be technically inferior to proprietary ones.

      I use linux because I hate microsoft, not because it’s more feature complete than windows (it isn’t).

      I use lemmy because I hate u/spez, not because it’s more feature complete than reddit (it isn’t).

      I use blender because it’s free and it’s actually kinda great, if all free and open source software was like blender, then it would be a no-brainer to use FOSS all of the time, and it would be easy to convince the normies to do the same.


      also also

      I’m using linux mint, i have minor complaints about it, but nothing worse than what microsoft is currently doing with windows. It’s just different, and that bothers me. middle click paste is the bane of my existence, but other people swear by it. Just before I switched over, I learned about windows 10’s built in emoji keyboard, and I really liked that. A year later (literally last week) I discovered a program that does most of what the windows emoji thingy did, and I can manually edit a keybind for the function to accomplish amost the same thing. FOSS, yay, it’s free if you don’t value your time in currency amounts. FOSS could be so good if only it were good.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        while I agree, the reality of the situation is that when you get down to comparing feature to feature, open source solutions tend to be technically inferior to proprietary ones.

        Yes. But there is nothing bluesky does that mastodon doesn’t. It’s a platform to write short text posts and have it viewed by other people. It’s not rocket science.