• castlebravo404@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      59 minutes ago

      Probably an abundance of caution. I’m pretty sure referrer headers wouldn’t be sent if you modified the URL and that’s the only concern I can think of.

      *For a new tab that is. Cookies aren’t going to care about a new tab unless you open a private one first.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    These artists should switch platforms because the query string isn’t the only way they can track attribution. If they see people doing this they will just switch to something else if they don’t already use another method as well.

  • renegadesporkA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A dumb policy with perhaps an even dumber implementation. Basing profit sharing percentages off query parameters 🫨 ?

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The parameters are how you get to the store.

      If the creator is driving the traffic, Gumroad takes 10%. If Gumroad is driving the traffic, they take a commission of 30%

      • renegadesporkA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I understand that. That approach is just really easy to manipulate.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Not any more than any other tracking method. They control it all.

          If anything, the fact that they give you a method to alter how your purchase is tracked so you can still give the creator 90% when you get to them through their store is pro-creator.

          • renegadesporkA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The ability to alter the tracking is an exploit, not a feature. Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad it’s possible, but it seems more a result of a lazy implementation rather than a generous choice.

            Not any more than any other tracking method.

            This isn’t true. There are more opaque ways to track this like cookies, redirects (triggering an api call), and scripts. These could also be exploited depending on how they’re done, but it would be way less obvious than just changing the URI.

            It just seems like they chose the simplest method, thus hampering the effectiveness of their greed.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Wait, you’re complaining that end users can change it?

              Yes, there are ways the website could prevent that. I’m not sure why that goal serves any purpose, though. Defaults are going to get them the vast majority of the commissions they earn, and being simple and easy for users who really want to reward the creators more to do so is worth the negligible cost.

              Getting commission on sales you make isn’t greed.

  • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    OK, I think the real solution is that I’m never using Gumroad again. Sad, as some really good and stuff was in there