• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Wealth inequality is the cause of almost every single economic and social issue in existence.

    If young men had the money to have agency in their lives they would be living life instead of living with their parents to save money while seeking validation through internet fascists.

    If school wasn’t desigend to be a day care service for Capitalists our children would be properly socialized with the different sexes/genders before getting the chance to grow up into incels.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I call it economic infantilization.

      Back in 1960 US minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the average US home was $11,000.00 A brand new car was around $2,500.00 A teenager could move out of the house and be self supporting and grade school kid could work hard and pay for a car on their 18th birthday.

      It’s hard to feel like an independent adult when you can’t afford anything.

      • tartaruga@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I cry bullshit. Incels aren’t that way because of money. Generation X ate out of dumpsters and did what they could to survive. Not saying younger generations have it easy, but you can be broke and not be a misogynist. From what I understand, sex offenders created the incel movement to normalize their bullshit. Trump and all of those rapists want a world where they can be evil with no consequences. They are working hard towards that end. They need an army of like minded degenerate perverts to achieve this. The algorithms promote this sort of insecure male content on YouTube and other media. Most of those influenders make money trafficking women for sex. This is a new thing. 30 years ago, people were moving away from sexism, and racism. Now, everyone is a protégé of the sociopath billionaires and misogynist tech bro oligarchs. People need to realize this isn’t a natural movement, it’s a synthetic one. Fuck incels! Not literally, of course.

        • mad_djinn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          30 years ago, people were moving away from sexism, and racism.

          what ? my liberal friend, you’ve been in an echo chamber since birth. welcome to the real world. sun down towns never stopped existing. the glass ceiling never shattered. dropping racist slurs in the company of white friends never went out of fashion.

          you are just too poor to know anyone who isn’t performatively liberal

          • tartaruga@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Back 30 years ago, there were spheres outside the old boys club and celebrity racket. Naturally, much was done to destroy that. If people had the option to interact with people who aren’t psychpaths, racists and assholes, they choose that option.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Conservative Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency, and Conservative Ronald Reagan put Sandra O’Connor on the supreme court over more qualified candidates because he wanted a woman on the bench. People were pushing the GOP to make Colin Powell the 1996 and 2000 candidate [he didn’t because his wife was afraid he’d be assassinated]

        • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          the Nazis and other fascists used hyper masculinity to appeal to young men’s lack of agency in post WW1 Europe

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s kind of a perfect storm.

          Fifty years ago, Alvin Toffler wrote a book called ‘Future Shock.’ He knew that there would be people who couldn’t/wouldn’t adapt themselves to the coming change from the Industrial era to the Digital Age. We’ve got people using the most advanced tech to push the stupidest ideas.

      • mad_djinn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        Okay lets do the litmus test:

        What do you think of Israel?

        What do you think of the C.E.O.'s who encourage policies that deny warranted health care?

        Did the URSS create famines? (I’m leaving this one in here because it’s a hilarious typo and you deserve to understand how silly you look)

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          You don’t know what URSS is?

          Even if I had made a mistake, you just look like a sore loser festering about il lol.

  • eleitl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    What a terrible article. NEETS and lie flat movement has almost no overlap with incels.

    • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ostensibly the whole world has been online for enough time now. Yet everyone continues to demonstrate a remarkable lack of ability to grasp internet cultures.

      It makes no sense. Like trying to explain technology to my elderly grandma. Except she knows she’s very old and out of touch. What’s everyone elses excuse. It’s made even worse because everyone else thinks they are digitial culture savvy.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s intentional to cause infighting and and to help build the association between neets and incels.

        Ars Technica is owned by Conde Nast media conglomerate, which is owned by Advanced Publications, which is owned and controlled by the billionaire Newhouse Family.

        That’s why Steve Newhouse wants these types of articles to be written, because it obfuscates truth and pushes division.

        Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      And what do you base that of? It’s incredibly easy to identify the cause of that overlap…

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Since we’ve past growth now there are precious few winners in a zero sum game. Why even try, if you’re not cut to be a liar and a thief?

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        …I’m honestly not sure if this is sarcasm or not - if you’re pointing out a problematic point of view or if you’re attacking the people the article is talking about.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Reading these comments makes understanding why the world is in its current state, extremely easy

    Keep preaching and applying that brand of empathy guys, it will surely pay off eventually

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The simple fact is no one really cares about the plight of men, and this is obvious when you look at social service funding and especially homeless shelters.

      We are in a ‘bare branch’ crisis, and back when this happened in medieval China, whole gangs of angry unmarriable men would form raider bands and just pillage and rape until they were put down by the military. It happened so often that warring states would purposely stage useless battles with massive losses on both sides to keep down the ‘bare branch’ population so they didn’t get to rioting levels.

      Maybe the fact that warfare is no longer culling the most desperate, lonely, and impressionable men has let to such a large population of unfocused, angry, lonely, and fundamentally unlikeable males.

      It’s mainly because biologically we evolved to have kids and die on a hunt, our evolution pressures just aren’t capable of handling a male population without a certain degree of unnatural casualty.

      • passwordforgetter@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Based comment. In our society, men still believe in working 50+ hours a week for peanuts, so we won’t see any of these gangs forming any time soon. Maybe a few active clubs though lol

  • passwordforgetter@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fight hard in the comment section, brocels! Victory is coming!!! A lot of comments here missed the point - the article isn’t talking about pssy, it’s primarily about job prospects. Incels are just men who fail in every way in which it’s possible to fail. Lack of pssy is just a normal result of having no money, no status and no job.

  • justadudeingear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    a creepy tv show with a kid who is supposedly atttractively psychopathic? puhlees. you cant handle raising kids. teenages scare the shit out of me. get over it. some karen wrote that script because she had post partum depression in the 200th trimester. grow a pair skag.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Raising kids these days must be a real minefield with all this toxic culture being so accessible.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The kids are also at school half the day or more, we’re trying to teach and reinforce critical thinking as much as possible with our son. And I’m trying to show him that there are lots of ways to solve problems when examples arise.

        But I’m also a dad that both fixes the cars and cooks the dinners and solders the electronics and sows on the buttons. He’s a smart kid, and a contrarian like his folks, so I hope he’s gonna be ok.

    • Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fundamentalist religion is at the top of the toxic culture, and it has been around since before the incel term.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Anyone offering easy answers to complex questions should be suspect. And that does largely incriminate all religious groups around the world. They often espouse seemingly decent and benign ideologies. But unfortunately the mindset that latches on to those things, idealogues; are the danger. Even if the ideology themselves aren’t necessarily.

        • Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          They often espouse seemingly decent and benign ideologies.

          Sometimes they are so conditioned that they don’t even think of their bigotry as bigotry.

          I think organized religion fills their heads with problematic ideas about gender roles.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Heh, while religion isn’t required for that. It’s impossible to argue that it doesn’t help with it. Putting faith in anything and turning off critical thinking is always a recipe for disaster.

          • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Pretty sure the old testament gives wives more authority in the community and in the household than what our current government is aiming for.

            Fucking hell there are instructions for abortifactants in the OT

            Don’t pin this on religion, this is purely the bias of petty men coloring their interpretations.

        • rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          We had an easy answer - a decent paying job that offered a decent lifestyle and a hope for a better future but the rich took it away.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    How can we help them make more friends? How can we get them involved in real-world activities that will diminish their time spent online?

    By locking them into suburban houses with no places to go without being driven by their parents, until they’re old enough to drive. 🇺🇸🇨🇦

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sooooo… when are we gonna admit that men’s mental health is unfortunaly heavily tied to their career prospects?

    No, not yet?

    Okay I’ll keep waiting.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      sigh

      It’s capitalism.

      Men’s well being wouldn’t be tied to career prospects if it weren’t for the rat race we are all brainwashed into since birth that is capitalism.

      You have worth as a human beyond your capacity to produce profit.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        You have worth as a human beyond your capacity to produce profit.

        This is only true in a vague, wishy-washy metaphysical sense. Fine, whatever, you have intrinsic value. If that warms your cockles, more power to you.

        But the extent to which other people value you is entirely dependent on what you can provide to them. This has nothing to do with capitalism. Do you think that in a socialist society, a person who refused to do any work at all - not because they couldn’t, but just because they didn’t feel like it - would be shown general love and acceptance and kindness? No! They would, at best, be tolerated and given the bare necessities to survive - but they wouldnt be celebrated. Do you think primitive tribes love and support the lazy asshole who never contributes and just expects food to be brought to them every day? No, of course not! They kick that motherfucker out when they are dead weight.

        And what you “provide” for other people doesn’t have to make money. But it does need to provide some kind of value. Do you have a beautiful smile that brightens peoples’ day? Are you tall enough to reach things on the top shelf, and willing to reach them for short people? Can you make hilarious dolphin sounds at parties? Are you a supportive friend who listens to others’ struggles when they are down? No? You just sit your ass on the couch all day and watch TV and interact with basically no one? Then why the fuck would you expect anyone to value you, when you provide no value to them? This is not a capitalism problem. This is a human solution. Dead weight gets dropped. Period. Always has, always will.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, they weren’t. Class was much more important. There was no class climbing prospect. You either were born into a having family or you weren’t. Even amongst peasants, men weren’t suppose to “have a career” or a prospect. You inherited whatever your family had.

          There was expectations of performance, of course. There was internal competition, but no peasant would ever realistically transform into nobility via merit or otherwise.

          Those ignorant of history forget that our current worldviews and values weren’t always universal. The notion of a linear career, of having prospects, to be successful, to grow from a low place and climb the social and financial rings, accumulating wealth enough to retire early then leave a lofty inheritance to children and grandchildren. All that is modern construction that is not present before the 19th century. Furthermore, the expectations that all the other poor people are lazy scumbags, but my poverty is merely a circumstantial setback is a very American exceptialism view.

          • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            So you are saying that a father of a girl at any class level in a feudal society cared not about the ability of a mate to provide for his daughter or grandchildren?

            That kings and earls didn’t bring wealth and power into matchmaking calculations?

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              In general, no. It was a business transaction and whoever provided an appropriate dowry would get the girl. No matter their future prospects. The family didn’t care much for whatever happened to the girl afterwards. High class and nobility might’ve care for prestige and title inheritance. But otherwise it didn’t matter. We got so many historical novels with the plot point of a girl marrying a destitute nobleman and being abandoned by her original family that it is sort of a trope in the romantic period. Girl being sold by bankrupt father to save on food with one less mouth to feed was also a trope. You have to remember women weren’t valued much beyond their capacity of bearing children. They were little more than cattle for most western feudal societies.

      • Saff@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah and the reason young men are finding it hard to have real life friends and end up on uncle forums is because we lost most of our “third spaces” thanks to them not making money and shutting down or being underfunded or closed if they were publicly owned.

        Ontop of this the constant algorithms that push specific topics to people over and over due to it keeping them on the platform and therefore generates income.

        It does feel like 75% of this problem could be fixed by stopping corporate greed and fixing our local communities as whole.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 days ago

          I went to a Humans vs. Zombies Nerf war at a university campus a few weeks ago. A couple hundred people, real strong mix of men, women, and others. A healthy mingling of people who were clearly gun hobby adjacent and a lot of openly queer folk, which I think is really quite encouraging to see. Everyone had a good time, no issues the whole day. Good vibes all around.

          At the end of the event, the student organizers tearfully announced that the school administration had decided to ban all blaster events on campus going forward. Fuck us all for trying to have a healthy good time, right?

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          56
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          we lost most of our “third spaces” thanks to them not making money and shutting down or being underfunded or closed if they were publicly owned.

          And also shut down by female supremacist activists.

          A gym started up last decade in my town, as a men’s only gym. A place for guys to come and exercise without distraction.

          It got sued within the year by a woman who tried to join. It went to court. Company ran out of money before the court case closed, went bankrupt and had to close.

          The case proceeded to completion, the woman won, and all the women’s groups in the area crowed about their phyrric “victory” over misogyny.

          There are three women’s-only gyms in town, six in the greater geographical region. None of these have ever had men demanding to become members, because those men would be nailed to the wall for being misogynists.

          This happens eventually to all “men’s spaces” that exist long enough: they are forced to no longer be “men’s spaces”, because being a “man’s space” is misogynistic.

          Women’s spaces? Totally fine. Not misandric in the least.

          See how “equality” works?


          Edit:

          Pick any third space where women’s only spaces exist, and you will also find men’s-only spaces that were sued either into nonexistence or into opening their doors for women, which caused it to no longer be a “men’s space”. From boxing clubs to smoking clubs to the f**king Boy Scouts of America, men’s spaces everywhere are being eliminated in the drive to “combat misogyny”.

          Meanwhile, the president of the Girl Scouts privately admitted (can’t recall exactly when, but it was either during or shortly after the Boy Scout’s trial) that she would rather shut down the entire org than allow a single boy to join. And she was lauded for that position.

          “Rules for thee, but not for me.”

          That isn’t “equality” in the least. That’s blatant gender bigotry. And that is what the “black pill” is built upon - actual real-world evidence.

          You want the black pill to stop existing? QUIT SHOVELLING THEM COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF AMMUNITION, FFS.

          • r.EndTimes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            lol I would like a male version of curves, I get anxiety and think ppl think im looking at them when I zone out, its never been an issue, like they usually just smile at me and I realize it looks like im staring at them looking away, still dont like having anxiety over it. Why is it insane to think men could be more comfortable in a mens only gym like women are at womens only. The gym in my hometown before they added cardio machines was peak.

            I think the whole gym influencer stuff thing becoming popular made it worse forsure, wasnt as axious til those vids of woman recording men walking past and posting them online and my gym became a maze of tripods with everyone taking 10 hours to do their sets and check their footage. (The men are the issue here too)

            But also gyms have nothing to do with third spaces, ppl use them like that but I think its out of neccesity.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            How is wanting to be equal supremacist?

            If you want to run a public business, the social contract has always been that you serve the public.

            Claiming that men/boys need to be separated because “they can’t control themselves” only enables the incel type behaviors. As well as belittling men. Because as a cis man, I certainly have no issue respecting a woman. Or any issue focusing on other things when they’re around. If men and boys were more familiar with interacting with women, they likely wouldn’t be bitter incels. Unable to understand why no woman wants to be around them. Like, literally.

          • Saff@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            These third spaces don’t have to be exclusively young men lol. In fact it might be better if they aren’t given the specific topic of people we are talking about in this thread. In general an increase in community locations is a good thing, but it seemed especially so for people in the intel rabbit hole. Somewhere casual they can come out of their shells and meet people in the real world!

            • blarghly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I honestly don’t think third spaces on their own are the answer. After all, suppose a city makes a nice park across the street from an incel’s apartment. Maybe they’ll leave their house and go there… but do you really think this socially awkward weirdo is gonna start striking up conversations with other people there? Do you think they are going to engage with others who say hello to them, if others interact with them at all? Yes, a lack of third spaces is a problem, but I don’t think it is the lynchpin. We are also less likely to visit third places when they do exist these days due to digital distractions. People seem to be more insular, less likely to introduce themselves to strangers and less likely to be open to strangers introducing themselves. And significant social anxiety and lack of social skills is seldom overcome simply by having a neutral environment.

              What we really need is grassroots social movements dedicated to being friendly to strangers, reducing digital distractions, reaching out to men who feel left behind, and informing parents about the importance of proactively ensuring that their children have healthy social and emotional lives.

              • rekabis@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I honestly don’t think third spaces on their own are the answer.

                And I would agree. Men in a group setting of only men will typically behave entirely differently than if you drop even a single woman into their midst. A man who is only among men will open up and behave and accept constructive criticism in ways that he will never do with even a single woman present. The change in behaviour a man exhibits in the presence of a woman is instinctual and unconscious, and is unable to be controlled or even moderated by the vast majority of men out there.

                Having male-only spaces is absolutely essential to allowing men to behave as they would without the unconscious/instinctual pressure they would be subject to with a woman present.

                Too bad these kinds of places are “misogynistic” in ways that women-only spaces are “not misandric”. The gender bigotry and hypocrisy in this dichotomy is blindingly overwhelming.

                • applemao@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Probably why gaming bros became so popular. A time to hang out with “da boys” because there aren’t any other places you can do that without spending money.

                • blarghly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I’m not saying you are categorically wrong about the benefits of male-only spaces. But I will say that the attitude and language with which you are approaching the issue is not doing you any favors.

            • rekabis@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              These third spaces don’t have to be exclusively young men

              Average age of the membership was 46. That doesn’t sound “young” to me.

              Some men are just eager to have a communal workout environment that doesn’t have gym thots preening their thirst trap poses all over the place

              • Saff@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I feel like that’s more a problem of whatever specific gyms you are going to. Ones I go to have usually have signs up saying no cameras allowing people to just focus on their own workout. Regardless, the point is that if you want to help people overcome their “the world is against me, no woman wants me” mind set of an incel, there should be more spaces that let people interact with others outside of online algorithm controlled or bot account flooded social media platforms. Places to meet and converse with real people of any gender. All of a sudden they will probably realise that most people are actually nice. Most people don’t generally go around trying to make people feel shit or uncomfortable.

                • rekabis@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  LOLOLOLOLOL!!!

                  Imagine not wanting any hot women around.

                  Classic MGTOW vibes here

                  Imagine being the guy whose primary excuse to go to the gym is to “ogle hot women”.

                  Yeah, you’re a real progressive guy.

                  The sign of a man with experience is when he’s become sick of women’s shit.

                  The woman I am married to - which BTW, makes me wholly ineligible for MGTOW status - is one of the few women out there I actually want to spend time with beyond social niceties. I have zero interest in the vast majority of women out there - regardless of “hotness” - because I have come to know how women in general act and react; what their motivations are and how they approach life in general. And that just makes me wholly uninterested in them.

                  Don’t get me wrong, I will absolutely be polite and civil to women. I have absolutely no problem socializing with them and making them feel appreciated and valued as I would any human being, regardless of gender (or fractional thereof). I just have no interest in them as women.

            • rekabis@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              7 days ago

              FOUND ONE!!!

              Ah, a classic strategy of the intellectually bankrupt - an ad hominem. attacking the man instead of the argument.

              Some of us tend to be obsessed with facts and evidence, and are not easily affected by the public shaming that arises from an intellectually bankrupt thought-terminating response. Try your strategy on someone else.

              • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Facts and evidence are not on your side no matter how much you scream that they are… based on your singular anecdote, no less Classic brainwashed fascist incel vibes there.

                • rekabis@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Facts and evidence are not on your side

                  • Boxing clubs and some martial arts clubs that have existed for many decades
                  • Smoking clubs that have existed for centuries
                  • The f**king Boy Scouts of America

                  The evidence is out there for anyone not blinded by fact-free ideology. You just have to look.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        “Career prospects” in this case means that men want to feel like they’re of use to society. The issue is only tied to capitalism in the sense that the current capitalist environment doesn’t offer many of them meaningful work. I’m not sure what alternative to capitalism you imagine would solve that problem - without also giving men those same career prospects they’re currently lacking. Taking care of and providing for the tribe is what we’re hardcoded to get meaning from.

        • pahlimur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’ve seen so many men just suck at doing adult stuff in my life and career. It’s not a problem of men not having the opportunity to show value, it’s more that they expect to have value without providing anything. So if you feel useless, it’s more of a you problem that current media allows you to blame other people for.

          Capitalism is causing some of these issues. The core issue is men expecting the world to hand them a sense of value.

    • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      How bout instead of waiting you arm up and help overthrow the EXTREMELY VIOLENT capitalist system? Go hunt a hedgefunder or private equity broker

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      SOOOOOOOO……we can all admit now that socioeconomics is real. Cuz I’d hate to think anyone would think this is a new concept and would affect only one group recently and they still sit there and think they are unique to this ’phenomenon’ whilst it’s been an effect for generations already and has gone ignored for about as long. And they’ve had to just ‘deal with it’.

      Cuz I’m real sick of seeing this argument like it’s not been around and affecting whole swaths of groups of people for centuries.

      You can admit there’s been slaves and it’s affected their families poorly? Let’s start with that. And it’s still happening. And it’s still being brushed under the carpet and there’s still flagrant racism targeting entire communities to ignore their prospects.

      For generations.

      Cuz that all happened way before incels in the burbs came about.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “It’s important to remember that it’s not zero-sum. We can care about the well-being of women and girls and also acknowledge that young men are struggling, too. Those don’t have to be at odds.”

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s pretty easy to give up trying to build a future for yourself when it has been made abundantly clear to you that your future is not part of the grand plan.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      And it’s pretty easy to realize you can take a future by scam, violence, and fraud easier than you can by dedicating your life to making other people rich.

      Maybe a nation of roving bandit gangs is what we need for a while