• breecher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nah, it is the other way around. Historians would say those facts, and Hollywood and possibly general media would be the ones saying “sexy”.

      • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah one of the fist ways I learned to create engagement was to fake typos / make simple grammer mistakes.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I didn’t realize that was supposed to be an I, | thought it was being used like asterisks to indicate action.

      • witchybitchy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        that’s what I think it’s supposed to be, but then the middle one is missing the | so who knows

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not meant to be an I, it’s meant to be an action. They’re not writing “I commanded an army”, they’re writing “commanded an army”.

      No, it was not a good choice. But that’s what they were probably doing.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, my brain just didn’t even process it as an I. I just looked over it and started the sentences without them.

      Anyway, why the fuck did they do that?

  • Oscar Cunningham@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 days ago

    Stable and prosperous? She started with a civil war and ended by being conquered by Rome. The bit in the middle wasn’t stable either.

  • Meltdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can you give a single example of an ancient historian describing her as sexy? All the sources I’ve seen focus on her skills and realpolitik rather than her beauty.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      3 Antony, on the contrary, like Heracles in paintings where Omphalé is seen taking away his club and stripping off his lion’s skin, was often disarmed by Cleopatra, subdued by her spells, 957and persuaded to  p339 drop from his hands great undertakings and necessary campaigns, only to roam about and play with her on the sea-shores by Canopus and Taphosiris. 4 And at last, like Paris, he ran away from the battle and sank upon her bosom; although, more truly stated, Paris ran away to Helen’s chamber after he had been defeated; but Antony ran away in chase of Cleopatra, and thereby threw away the victory.

      Plutarch was a bit of both, but that tendency has definitely existed longer than movies.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nothing to me says ‘sexy’ quite like your grandad and your great-grandad being the same guy, or your (great * 5)-grandmother / grandfather being one man and woman, when most people have that responsibility spread between 64 people.

    Close family. Must have made Christmas easy - having the in-laws round isn’t so bad when they’re your own blood relatives too.

  • MusicSoulEdu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I do find it hilarious that we associate sexiness with Cleopatra because of an intensive smear campaign.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      She probably was legitimately attractive by Roman cultural norms and almost certainly leveraged that when dealing with Rome. The smear campaign was more playing that aspect up while downplaying the fact she was a genuine once-in-a-generation genius than making up things about how sexy she was.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t historians say she probably wasn’t sexy? Just super bold which attracted powerful men, who hasn’t seen much of that back then.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      She was a powerful personality. All the records indicate that she was of seemingly above average beauty standards, but nothing earth shattering.

      Instead, it is claimed that her strength of personality is what attracted the powerful men in her life to her.

    • Konstant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      She probably like a lot of celebrities who are average looking but over produce to look way hotter.

    • HowAbt2day@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      She had access to creams, ointments and fragrances and good sleep. She also kept ugly ass lady servants to keep the contrast in her favor.

    • breecher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, it is the exact opposite of what OP claims. Historians are basically the only ones constantly demystifying her, while her legend as a sexy femme fatale lives on in the general public mind (thanks pretty much exclusively to Hollywood, because let’s face it, noone would know she existed without them).