• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    The insane thing about Bitcoin’s continued popularity is that out of all the thousands of cryptocurrencies out there, it’s easily the worst in every regard.

    I’m not going to name names for fear of being called a shill, but if you want a cryptocurrency for just buying stuff there’s a ton that are more stable, faster, don’t cost a fortune to process, and don’t destroy the planet.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I remember launching my wallet that I hadn’t touched for years and I was hit with many days of syncing. It basically had to download gigabytes of data about blockchain since the last time I touched the wallet. I was blown away by the inefficiency and resource usage for seemingly simple things

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It dominates because it’s the one that everyone knows. If you’re lucky enough to find a shop that accepts crypto it’s almost certain that the crypto they accept is bitcoin and bitcoin only. despite its flaws it is a proven technology. It might 3 hours to send an on chain payment but you don’t have to worry about a technical glitch dropping it.

      I somewhat agree about it being not great though. it has serious scalability issues that were supposed to be addressed by lightning but lightning adds a lot of complexity imo. My grandma is never going to be able to figure out how to use lightning whilst still being able to benefit from a self custody wallet.

      A lot of the newer coins that crypto bros bang on about seem to be centralized under private entities, “regulation friendly” and not distributed.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Lmao, crypto tech bros coming out of the woodwork trying to get popularity for their bag holder’s game…

    Also pretending that shit hasn’t been bought up by wall street

    • O_i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      What? They have like 5%. You should revisit your stance

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Isn’t this a right wing meme about centrists, but with the text changed?

    The Bitcoin side wouldn’t catch you, because that interferes with the user’s choice to hit the ground.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Perhaps the original is right-wing, though this happens a lot (e.g. the “change my mind” guy). This meme seems anti-collective shout, so I’d place it left wing.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Last time I checked, BTC transaction fees were prohibitively high to pay for 80$ AAAA games with them, and WAY too high to pay for a 5 USD single-developer itch.io game.

    I haven’t looked at other Crypto in a while. I made some money off BTC, but I think it is wildly overvalued for a long time, and I’ve been disappointed in how un-currency-like other alternatives were, even those that have been around long enough that they are unlikely to be rug-pulls.

    That said, if you need to get paid and Visa/MC won’t let you use them, I’m not going to attack you (too hard) for accepting Crypto. They are bad systems, but we live in Captialism, so you gotta get paid. They might be the least-worse system that is global and isn’t Visa/MC. I’m unlikely to buy your product that way, tho; I’m more likely to pirate than I am to participate in cryptocurrency again.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Could’ve would’ve should’ve

      So many things could be so much better.

      Poverty could end tomorrow if we wanted to.

      War could end tomorrow if we wanted to

      Healthcare could be free if we wanted to

      Same for schools and education in general

      “If we wanted to”

      Let me rephrase that: if either the top 1% would let us, or if the 99% would just stand up and take what’s theirs, we could…

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes let’s definitely side with the scam that’s been around for two decades and its only practical use is to rug pull chumps yes this is good advice

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bitcoin is a lot of things, it’s not a scam. Some cryptocoins aren’t scams either or didn’t start as one.

      A lot of crypto coins are scams

      Bitcoin and any blockchain based payment system is not a viable alternative to payment processors at world scale. Unless power requirements per transaction go down literally exponentially, it will never be.

      Having said all that: Bitcoin does work on the current limited scale, it works better and easier and faster han all payment processors, and most importantly: Bitcoin isn’t a giant dick wanting to insert itself into every orifice of your body

      Fuck Visa, fuck MasterCard, fuck American Express, fuck all of them you fucking psychopathic narcissistic assholes

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Bitcoin may not be a scam per se, but its main usage is to facilitate scams. The biggest of which is being a market that speculators can manipulate to make the currency they actually want.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not a scam requires a huge Wikipedia <citation needed>

          I’m not saying it’s great, it’s shit, but at least it’s not as evil as visa or MasterCard

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think this is bit what the post is trying to say.

      A few days ago, visa and MasterCard forced steam to stop selling some games they didn’t like, and is not the first time. For many of us (I’m not a bitcoiner nor a crypto bro, my entire crypto wallet is 1usd) the first thought was “this is ridiculous. They have a duopoly so they get to decide the rules of the internet. This can be solved with crypto to remove all the unnecessary middlemen”. I felt the push. It reignited my interest in the tech and am once again seeing what’s out there, fees, and transaction times looking for a good balance

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Needlessly antagonistic interpretation presented not for good faith discussion but for your own fragile emotional needs. Reap what you sow.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If you do not know a lot about “crypto” then I would say the main thing to understand is that there is Bitcoin (not owned by any single entity) and then there is everything else. Other “coins” are owned by corporations that can make decisions about it and change it to some extent. These are extremely risky.

    Bitcoin (btc) does have risk but much less. It is not owned by any company or person or country. It is like the internet, only exists because tens of thousands of internet providers(miners for Bitcoin) around the world make it possible. Bitcoin has, in its codebase, a limitation that any change must be agreed upon by 95% of these providers(miners). This way security patches and bug fixes can be added because everyone agrees those are good. Other harmful changes would never reach 95% agreement therefor could never be implemented. There is a limit of 21 million Bitcoin and this number can never increase unless 95% agree to it… which they never would. This is in stark contrast to normal money which is constantly printed(at random rates depending on who happens to be in control at that moment) so that the supply increases making its value drop.

    Scamming happens with cryptos, Bitcoin, euros, dollars,yuan… and always will.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      What about Ethereum? I always thought Bitcoin was something to avoid since it’s proof-of-work.

      • PropaGandalf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        yeah, to me bitcoin is rather a interesting pioneeing project which now is obsolete. there are a ton of decentralized DLTs that re not bitcoin and not even a blockchain in some cases (like Holochain for example)

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Etherium, Solana…etc are the next level of more risky networks. They have distributed upgrade/change protocols as well but are not as decentralized as bitcoin. As for how efficient a coin is, I am not comparing that metric as efficiently does not correlate to risk. This post was just referring to risk.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      there is Bitcoin (not owned by any single entity) and then there is everything else. Other “coins” are owned by corporations that can make decisions about it and change it to some extent. These are extremely risky.

      What? Just ridiculous misinformation. Every coin but BTC is owned by corporations? Huh?

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Personally, I’m not aware of any other coin that is not connected to a person or company. Can you name me a few? Note that coins like ethereum has clear central ownership and are not developed by community itself.

        Tomorrow, ETH founder Vitalik (I think that was his name?) could tweet that he has taken a side in Israel-Palestine conflict, potentially angering good portion of ETH user base and dropping it’s value.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        True, controlled by corporations or individuals except a few. XRP is an example of a coin that could be drastically changed and the coin owners would be left in the cold.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly, what’s the point of a credit card? Why don’t people mostly use debit cards? It gets just directly wire transferred from your account. No sort of junk fees or monthly subscription needed. Genuine Question.

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      If someone steals your debit card, they can directly take money out of your account. With credit cards, there’s a buffer between the product and the bank account, and it makes it easier to stop fraud

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        But is it really worth all of the junk that you have to accept? I like the credit scoring, the monthly subscription, and, if you miss the date for paying back, the absurdly high fees. Well, yes, with the debit card you have, technically speaking, the risk of someone being able to make about 100€ worth of RFID payments, and then the code is needed again for the next 100€ RFID payments. For everything else that doesn’t involve RFID, the code is needed always.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The US implementation of chip and PIN left off the PIN. The reason given was “no one wants to put in a PIN every time” so for the vast majority of transactions you just hold up your card to the sensor or put it in the chip reader. PIN is only required for cash withdrawals in my experience.

          • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Jesus Christ, that is absolutely moronic. No wonder people are so obsessed with losing their card.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          What junk? Works same as a debt card but just not directly tied to a checking account, so less a big deal if it is lost or false charges made on it with companies reversing it. Get cashback on purchases, additional warranty on items, and able to do charge backs if company isn’t giving you a refund for whatever reason.

          Most people who run into trouble are because they don’t realize credit cards aren’t free money so go beyond their budget. If you spend what you can afford and pay back each month question becomes more why should a debit card be used over a credit card?

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well not to stop it before it happens, surely, but an easier time reclaiming your money due to the buffer.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Fiscally responsible people do it because of the cash back/perks and 0% interest.

      Fiscally irresponsible people do it because ‘free money’ (ignoring the 28% annual interest).

      Credit cards also offer better consumer protections than debit cards. Ex: chargebacks.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This is not true for many countries. Debit cards in my country have equal or even better consumer protections than credit cards and are also cheaper.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s true in the United States. In the US, a debit card transaction is an EFTPOS (electronic funds transfer at point of sale) and once you enter your PIN, there are no take-backs and if you want a refund and the merchant refuses, you have to resort to the legal system for recourse. Credit cards, on the other hand, have consumer protection rules and dispute procedures.

      • sobchak@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Fiscally irresponsible

        I mean, there are people who just don’t have the money for a needed “purchase” (like medical care, transportation, or food), and hope they’ll be able to get a better job or make more money in the future to pay it off later. Been there.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      My debit card is a master card.

      They still need to go through a payment processor, using a debit instead of credit card isn’t really the solution to the current problems.

    • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Tons of cards have zero fees. Some offer rewards and benefits at no real cost. I have for nearly a decade used a card with 1% back on purchases and 1% back on payments. Running all my usual spending through that and then just paying it off has net me a lot of money in that time that I just use for statement credit.

      It’s easy to dispute charges should I ever need to. Rare since I’m cautious anyways, but the extra layer before my actual bank account is nice.

      It has also built up a hell of a credit rating for me as well.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You can get 2% cards with no fees now as well. 2% on everything.

        Paid cards go up to 6%, or possibly higher.

        You can game this system if you don’t have debt on them.

        • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          That’s what I do. 2% card with zero fees and no debt on it. Run every possible expense through it monthly and just pay it off.

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I am usually cautious with claims of free money. There is no free money for working class people. So, who’s paying it in that case and for what reason? I reckon the company who is running the platform does it, such that they can get market share to coerce sellers into using their product.

        Or am I seeing this wrong?

        • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I will agree that a credit card only really made any sense as I began to finally gain more financial independence. Before then, it was pointless.

          The claim is that they are giving you a portion of the merchant fee for utilizing said credit cards.

          I’m sure they also make money by selling all your info.

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Because many people don’t actually have the money on hand. Some do but me and many others are spending money we don’t have yet. It’s a negative feedback loop of debt because capitalism sucks

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You get points. I pay a fee on only one of my cards, the one that gives me 6% back on groceries. I make decent money using that card.

    • O_i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve just got rid of my credit card after 10 years in NA. Yes it can come in handy if you need a couple grand all of a sudden but damn, what a ball and chain, I hated it

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The main reason I don’t care for bitcoin is I have to count a bunch zeros after the decimal point, before reaching a useful number. $1 = 0.000006128921 btc? Really? Screw those zeroes. Bitcoin is inefficient in so many ways.

    • Bubbey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you’re paying for small good (25-50$) you usually pay in “Satoshis” 0.00000001 BTC. If you convert it to dollars, 10 satoshis is 1 cent.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I still haven’t come across anywhere, or any reason, to buy goods with BTC. I look for things I need, not ways to spend. I have these beautiful apps showing me clearly how to buy bitcoin, but no one is giving me any reason to do it. What am I supposed to do with a satoshi? Groceries? Nope. Furniture? Nope. Housing? Nope. A T-shirt with some BTC logo on it? 🤨

      • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        And twenty bucks to the Chinese miners as a “transaction free”.

        Lightning network, taproot, all that shit, just paper over the fact that Bitcoin cannot, by design, handle enough transaction volume to become a general purpose currency without reinventing a lot of mostly centralized payment infrastructure.

          • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            You can commit money to a payment channel with a third party to create a private ledger so the third party can perform payments in your name to someone in using their shared channel on their private ledger.

            Motherfucker, that’s just a bank and two bank accounts with extra steps.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Things are often measured in mBTC or µBTC for this exact reason.

      Just as you don’t measure the length of an ant in meters, you measure it in millimeters.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        But you never see milliBTC or µBTC. Your post is literally the first time I see µBTC. No normal person knows how to type µ, let alone knowing what it means or how many eggs that buys. My crypto currency converter doesn’t even use µBTC.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      If that’s the biggest complaint you have about it, it’s probably not that bad.

      I don’t mind Bitcoin itself, but I do hate the ads and NFTs and pump and dump scams, obviously

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Bitcoin is its own worst enemy. It’s deflationary, speculative, and largely interacted with by centralized entities. Those things means its unlikely to be successful as an actual currency; even one it hopes to be.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      It was far less valuable when it first started becoming trendy. 1 BTC for a pizza, or whatever. Now it’s turned into a hyperinflation wheelbarrow kind of situation.

    • ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Monkey brain no like small numbers. Monkey brain like big numbers.

      But for real, Bitcoin was the first decentalized currency to solve the Byzantine Generals Problem. Its worth something because its transparent, unmutable, and the original digital currency. It was birthed via grassroot origins in depths of the housing crash. It calls out the Federal Reserve (and any other human institution that seeks to expand their money supply).

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s one of the least bad things about it, and if not for approximately twelve thousand bad things about it, would be easily fixable.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    This doesn’t even make any sense. Just use cash if you hate cards. Most places actually will love you for this.

    Fuck crypto.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Doesn’t work for online stuff. This is probably referencing how steam was recently forced to can a bunch of its porn games to appease payment processors.