Mine is orzo. It’s slippery and it should grow a spine and be either pasta or rice but not both.
Probably bowties AKA fucking farfalle. Difficult to grasp, harder to keep a hold of, don’t retain sauce. Who thought this would be a good idea? probably some british designer
Either sloppy and overcooked on the outside, or raw in the center. Choose only one option.
Hollow spaghetti. Impossible to suck it, because it has a vent hole.
Ah, bucatini, the devilse pasta. Nothing like accidentally aspirating on your pasta sauce.
Angel hair is probably my most disliked. It just tastes terrible and gets overcooked so easily. I also dislike ditalini but not nearly as much since that usually only goes in like minestrone soup and it might just be that I’m not a fan of minestrone.
For the best pasta shapes, look no further than Buccatini (the objectively better spaghetti), cellentani (idk it’s just fun), and gemelli (perfect texture for lightly sauced dishes).
I used to hate farfalle, but I’m okay with that one now. We’ve made our peace. It’s another example of a pasta shape that I only had in one particular dish that I didn’t care for and I formed a negative association as a result.
Honestly, farfalle. The middle is always too hard and the sides too floppy.
Agree. Don’t like smaller rotini either.
Orzo is great, but I get a brand that makes them significantly larger than Barilla. They’re quite large, much better texture.
Conchiglioni/Conchiglie, the ones roughly formed like a mussel. They tend to stick inside each other during cooking.
Spaghetti are sadly not rough enough for the sauces to stick to them.
Notably missing from all the answers here is dinosaur pasta since everyone likes them.
Honestly, spaghetti
If you’re Italian, sorry for the stroke
Same. Too slippery. Doesn’t grab the sauce
Spaghetti is not my favorite either, but if the pasta you’re using is not holding onto the sauce, then try a “bronze die cut” brand.
The brand I use and have had good luck with is Delallo.
But I completely agree with you, pasta that has a smooth exterior is useless. Since the whole point of it is to be a vehicle for the sauce.
Thanks for the info! I’d never heard of bronze die cut before. I’ve been buying De Cecco, so it’s validating to see that it’s one of these bronze cut pastas. I always knew it was better than Barilla! Lol
💯 Spaghetti, linguine, and similarly shaped pastas are the worst form factor. It holds virtually no sauce, which is the highlight of most pasta dishes. Conversely, spirals, wagon wheels, and texas shaped pastas are great because they have very high sauce:pasta ratios.
Just looked up ‘orzo’ , all I have to say is bros and broettes that is clearly rice case closed
I had to look it up too. We actually call that shape of pasta “risoni” in Australia. And the meal you make with it is also called “risoni”.
I love that stuff. Definitely better than rice.
Risoni clearly means rice - rice: confirmed 👍
Angel hair. Too fine, way too easy to overcook.
It was a thing in the 90s when people were doing “light” diets to eat angel hair pasta as a health food.
honestly not hard to overcook if you know how. it’s the only spaghetti noodle our family likes. the trick is to take it off the heat and drain it before it’s done, it will finish cooking in its own heat
I just wanted to let you know how you phrased your first sentence says the opposite of what you mean, I believe
lol thanks, my brain works at 50% at the best of times 😂
As much as I love lasagna, the noodles are the worst part of preparing the dish. They’re awkwardly large and heavy (for a noodle), and God help you if you overcook them even a bit as they will disintegrate under their own weight.
Am I missing something? You don’t have to precook lasagna noodles, you put them straight in the lasagna and they cook in the sauce.
depends heavily on the recipe. Due to my “enthusiasm” for pasta in general I prefer to make a much smaller portion, which is very easy to do with a lasagna in a mug, the only real downside is that the noodles need to be pliable first.
Hard to say because different pastas are made for different uses, and might not work as well if used for other things.
But if I had to pick one I’d say Angel hair. It’s just too thin and it makes me uncomfortable.
ITT: people who apparently struggle to eat pasta
I’d have to say shells, particularly the “shells & cheese” size. I always have quite a few shells stick together and end up undercooked, and I don’t really encounter that challenge with other shapes.
I actually like orzo a lot, but I’ve always had it in dishes where it behaves like (and is possibly mixed with) rice. I think it adds a nice (creamy?) balance to some other carby things, such as a veggies. Trader Joe’s sells one that really like that has orzo mixed with spinach, sundried tomatoes, and feta(?) cheese.
i use shells a lot, even for bowls of just pasta and sauce (vs a plate of sauce over spaghetti noodles). it’s just easier to scoop 'em up with a spoon.
use plenty of water and stir the pot frequently. i only have a problem with them sticking together while cooking if i neglect to do those two things.
they’re great in pasta salads or mac & cheese when you’re using peas in whatever you’re making. some of the peas work themselves into the shells. it’s like they were made for each other.
I love orzo how dare youHonestly I’m a huge pasta lover so it’s difficult for me to say. Probably farfalle whenever I eat it raw. The middle parts are always a pain to eat because of the shape.
Angel hair. Undercooked, undercooked, overcooked.
angel hair (Capelli D’Angelo) is fresh pasta to be had with a broth, so it shouldn’t may too much possible to have it undercooked or matter too much if it’s slightly overcooked.
