For context: I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD and I somehow need to get an app on there that only has a flatpak release

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    153·
    1 day ago

    People bitching about Flatpaks don’t understand that they have dedupe built in. You’re literally not using any more space and it’s easier for app developers to deploy.

    Try using Snaps sometime, if you want something to actually bitch about.

  • FurryMemesAccount@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    61·
    1 day ago

    Another missed occasion to have taken a screenshot. There’s gnome-screenshot, scrot, your DE’s integrated tool and so many others to choose from, you can do it!

    That sort of shit makes me hate the modern internet. (Also screenshots are cleaner and therefore compress better since you seem to care (rightfully) about storage space.)

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    391·
    2 days ago

    Flatpaks implement deduping, so they actually don’t take that much space when installed.

    I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD

    I think I found your real problem.

  • Gerowen@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    2 days ago

    Alternatively though, if an app has KDE library dependencies for example, it’s kinda nice to not have to install a whole other desktop system wide.

    • Aux@feddit.ukEnglish
      11·
      3 days ago

      Even cheap SD cards are larger these days. The smallest SSD you can buy in the UK right now is 250GB.

      • udon@lemmy.world
        32·
        2 days ago

        Reading through the comments here, the Linux community slowly seems move away from “runs on about every piece of hardware you can think of” to “if you don’t have at least the Nimbus 2000 that’s on you, sucker!”

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          2·
          1 day ago

          Gotta run FFMMLXIV at 94fps and 173hz @3890x2669 resolution otherwise you’re betraying the “Linux is the best gaming OS” movement we’ve all sworn fealty to.

  • renegadesporkAEnglish
    302·
    2 days ago

    Why the hell do you only have 8GB? Are you trying to install flatpaks on a smart fridge?

    • Luffy@lemmy.mlOP
      14·
      2 days ago

      Sort of, actually

      I was trying to build a PC just to play internet radio on using Shortwave, and a 30€ thin client with 4 1,5Ghz cores and no active cooling, 4 gigs of ram and an 8gb ssd were more than enough for that

      • uuldika@lemmy.ml
        2·
        1 day ago

        look into NixOS! there might already be a package for it. and NixOS can be very good about not duplicating dependencies.

        • Euphoma@lemmy.mlEnglish
          2·
          1 day ago

          I had a 200 gb ssd on my laptop and kept running out of space because all the old generations from nixos,

          • uuldika@lemmy.ml
            1·
            1 day ago

            nix collect-garbage, comrade! there’s also another command to clean up older generations. if you’re using git to version your nix config, you only really need to keep two generations: the current, and your last successful boot, since you can recover by git checkout.

      • renegadesporkAEnglish
        10·
        2 days ago

        For your use case, building from source might be more practical.

  • serenissi@lemmy.world
    313·
    3 days ago

    Cut the crap. Flatpak uses hardlink from repo where file names are jash of the file itself. The chance of duplication is exactly same as that of duplicate files of same name in same directory.

    Flatpak repo grows because we trade uncertainty over abi stability with installing all needed versions of libraries. For abi incompatible builds you could already do that in many distros (versioned soname) but to a lesser extent.

    Also I usually do not install nvidia GL with flatpaks that I won’t run on nvidia on hybrid gpu laptops anyway for energy reasons.

    • porl@lemmy.worldEnglish
      15·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I’m not a fan of flatpak for my usage, but this isn’t a great argument against it.

      I’d rather someone “only” release on flatpak if that’s the simplest way they can support Linux compared to no support at all.

  • pastaq@lemmy.world
    9825·
    3 days ago

    You hate people who spend hundreds of ours of their free time developing software, who then release that software for free, under no obligation to you or anyone else, and your reasoning is because they provide it in a packaging solution you don’t find ideal?

    Maybe fuck off and write your own software.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      811·
      3 days ago

      No, they hate flatpak, one of the many option to distribute software, which is not the only one even if you consider the “must run on many distro” restriction (which isn’t 100% true, kinda like the Java write once run anywhere). There are other options, some more involved, some simpler, to do so.

      They didn’t say they hate devs, that’s on you, grabbing a febble occasion to tell someone that voiced his opinion to “fuck off”.

      • pastaq@lemmy.world
        51·
        2 days ago

        Then they should say they hate flatpak, or they are frustrated/disappointed when something they are interested in is only on flatpak.

        Instead of doing that, they said they hate people who only use flatpak. Words matter, and that kind of entitlement needs to be shut down. The devs don’t owe them anything and they certainly don’t deserve hatred for their packaging solution. There are many constructive ways OP could resolve the issue. Open a feature request issue on the bug tracker, build it locally, send an email, offer to maintain another packaging method, etc.

  • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
    962·
    3 days ago

    Flatpak seems to be the best choice for consistency and to have it working straight out of the box. I think Linux currently needs this because we’re getting a lot less tech-savvy Linux users nowadays. Don’t get me wrong; package managers should still be used, but how are we going to get people to change if they run into package conflicts or accidentally uninstall a wrong package?

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        4·
        3 days ago

        Until it doesn’t work. There’s a lot of subtlety, and at some point you’ll have to match what the OS provide. Even containers are not “run absolutely anywhere” but “run mostly anywhere”.

        That doesn’t change the point, of course; software that are dependent on the actual kernel/low level library to provide something will be hard to get working in unexpected situations anyway, but the “silver bullet” argument irks me.

        • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
          51·
          2 days ago

          Everything is flawed, there is no silver bullet. But again, it’s still a massive improvement over what we had previously.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.ukEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      I just what to install an app. I don’t want to spend an evening figgering out how to get a PWA to install. I don’t want to consult a form or your git repository to install some package I will use once and will be patched out in the next version.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
      31·
      2 days ago

      It’s useful, but it isn’t the best option for everyone, so other options should be available.

      • lastweakness@lemm.ee
        1·
        2 days ago

        Why would you want the app devs to make that? The whole problem with distro-specific packages is having to package for multiple formats and it’s a painstaking process that really isn’t worth any amount of time investment at all. If you’re an app developer, you’d much rather just make a universal package and hope that some distro package maintainer packages your app for their distro. That’s just basic common sense…

        • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
          1·
          22 hours ago

          Because Flatpaks can’t share libraries or anything. It creates a lot of bloat that doesn’t need to be there. It’s great for users that want to make sure the app will always work, but it isn’t great for being efficient.

          • lastweakness@lemm.ee
            1·
            12 hours ago

            This is just a straight up lie. Flatpaks do share libraries, both as runtimes (as seen even in the screenshot here) and through deduplication between different runtimes and runtime versions. There’s usually very little bloat, if any, especially if you use Flatpaks a lot, which you probably should, given the huge number of advantages especially with proprietary apps.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    342·
    3 days ago

    Yeah flatpak won’t work on my Nokia 3310 either, what a shit software…

    Edit: if you upvoted this comment, your kneecaps pop when you pick up things from the ground

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    172·
    10 hours ago

    Lol kinda wild to me seeing flatpak hate as a new Linux user (running fedora with kde). Flatpaks have just worked for me and it’s been fantastic

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      151·
      2 days ago

      If you’re new to Linux, then your probably not familiar with the full Linux community yet. Much like in real life, online Linux spaces tend to have a very loud minority of conservatives who hate progress.

      Usually you’ll see them hating on things like systemd, 64bit architectures, containers, new packaging systems (like Flatpak), immutable and experimental distros (like Nix), Wayland, “bloated” desktops like KDE or Gnome, and much more.

      And just like in real life, the antidote is to not take another person’s word for it. Do your own homework/try things out yourself and arrive at your own conclusions.

  • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
    5·
    2 days ago

    and 8gb ssd? at that size it’s surely a removable 2242 ngff drive, it’s like 10$ for a 64gb one. you’re quite literally throttling your systems read/write speed, cause ssds want at least 20% free to manipulate files.

  • beastlykings@sh.itjust.works
    161·
    3 days ago

    I’m coming back to Linux after a hiatus. I’ve spent most of my time with the Debian flavors. Not afraid of the command line, but not an expert either.

    I’m trying out Bluefin right now, semi-immutable atomic os based on silverblue, based on Fedora.

    On normal installs, I usually change and install enough stuff, that when it comes time to upgrade to the next os version, I’m sometimes not able to without introducing instability or it outright falling. The former more common than the latter.

    Let’s just say I got used to reinstalling and starting from scratch, especially if I experimented too hard and broke something big like my DE or drivers.

    So with bluefin I’m hoping to leave everything that’s core, alone. I’m trying to rely on flatpaks, app images, and distrobox for everything else.

    So far so successful. I’ve only got a couple minor gripes, some limitations of flatpaks. But I’ve also only been at it for like a week, so we’ll see.

    I guess my point is, flatpaks have a place 🤷‍♂️