• OmegaMan@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    “third-party HDDs”

    In my day we just called these… HDDs. Anytime something so ubiquitous has to be labeled third-party, you know who the bad guy is instantly.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really love my Synology NAS (DS220+). I don’t anticipate needing to replace it anytime soon, but given how well it’s treated me, I would almost certainly replace it with a 2024 model instead of a newer one if I had to, given this new limitation.

    This decision from them seems short-sighted, I hope they reverse it.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Congratulations on the spineless, disgusting piece of shit who imposed this decision. I will look forward to burn my NAS and let them know my opinion, for fucking sure.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Haha wow what an absolutely HORRIBLE descision, wtf?! So glad I went with QNAP!!

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    buying brand name is almost always a bad idea when it comes to computers.

    take advantage of their modularity, people. desktops are still popular for a reason.

      • Fredy1422@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Very True, Though im utilizing a virtual machine as my go to NUC has bit the dust.

        • TBi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I had OMV running on an old Llano based system. I upgraded the system to Intel N100. I just put the drive in the new system and it booted with no issue (after network reset)

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Their low power compute hardware, very compact form factor, and OS/apps are the selling points.

      There are both commercial and DIY alternatives, but I am not aware of any that really check all three boxes quite as well.

      When my disk station eventually dies I’ll go the DIY route but that doesn’t mean I’ll be excited to do so.

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I built my own nas back in the day and it is not worth it. trying to remember an the mdadm commands, setting up Cron jobs for scrubbing and smart tests, setting up email notifications if the tests fail, flashing the firmware on my hba, setting up dynamic DNS, fail2ban (later a private key whitelist), borg etc etc. it’s not too bad if you’re an experienced Linux user but it’s still a lot of time out of your day, meanwhile if you’re a new Linux user then you’re basically just playing russian roulette with your data. building a jellyfin server is a good learning experience but for a nas I would pick an off the shelf appliance every time

  • Let's Go 2 the Mall!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love my synology router and had considered buying a NAS. That’s a deal breaker for me though. I have a proxmox machine running ubuntu server as a “NAS” right now so I’ll stick with that.