• notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    205
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      this is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference back in June. the appeals court has to apply the law. so you know who to blame.

      expect more cases like this in coming years…

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sarcastically speaking, if they want white only public bathrooms, that would be interesting. On the one hand people gave up their lives for us to have the freedom to go in the same places as white people. On the other hand… Its public restrooms!

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s currently not fill with people who want to help “prople”. It currently is setup to help corporate America only at this point. At the expense of your rights.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

      More specifically: gop.gov

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      One could go for a hundred years and not touch this shit. But nah. Some dirtbag judge asshole actively working to fuck us all over.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This isn’t “our government” these are the oligarch’s meatbags purchased for surprisingly low dollar amounts. These men (and women that silently stand next to them until they are told they are allowed to speak) are cowards and traitors. They are not “our government”

      Your post is the right energy, wrong message.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s because they’re not even trying to help people, except people who can pay.

    • arglebargle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 days ago

      Wait! You will get in trouble for that. Instead you need to have an LLC that does that for Profit somehow. Then all is forgiven!

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Put hundreds of them in a pretty boxes, form an LLC, get a few VCs to sign on, flip the switch, then charge a monthly fee to “open previously-inacessible service areas to cellular customers” and you’ll have a successful startup!

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ah but technically it’s still illegal to disrupt emergency services and also leaves you liable to lawsuits.

      But yeah, the FCC in particular can’t stop you from doing that.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hold on, GumpyDuckling… checks clipboard tsk tsk, I see here you’re not wealthy enough to effectively lobby to get us in trouble; I’m afraid that’ll be a $10,000 fine.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Their excuse is that telecom services aren’t actually providing telecom services, but information services.

    If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you aren’t brain-damaged.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        They’re trying to ban tiktok. I’ve never used it but it’s just because it’s Chinese, social media from any other company based in any other country is just as fucked and unhealthy and unregulated in the US, but they are going to ban it specifically for its country of origin. China pills a lot of weight and the company tiktok is powerful and fighting it in court and all but it seems pretty obvious it’ll go through even under current admin watch–let alone when a direct competitor and owner of Xitter owns the White House.

        While yes, you’re logistically correct it would be very difficult to shut down the whole Internet, that’s not the goal, the goal is to massively control it and enshittify it beyond your worst dreams.

        Look to China and Russia for "internet"TM

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Fair point. But I just believe it goes to show that more websites need to be available on the darknet. Not because it’s a scary or bad place to be, but because it can’t be censored. Not nearly as easily, anyway. Top level domains can very easily be seized by the domain registrar or ICANN, etc. But since onion domains use keys, it’s impossible to seize them without seizing the server they run on.

          The vast majority of people are woefully ill-prepared for an adversarial internet.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      But they’ll call it freedom of speech. Speech someone/corp paid for of course, but Citizens United…

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    comes a time when blue states just need to draw the line and flat out refuse to follow federal laws and judges until federal judges stop being corrupt.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 days ago

      They do it for marijuana laws but won’t treat anything else like that. I don’t understand.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        most blue states send more than they receive; all they have to do is stop sending money back to the federal government and red states would go broke.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          The states never see that money though. It’s directly from blue state workers’ paychecks and never passes through state owned bank accounts.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              You’re going to have to explain how that can change. And how it could be done quickly. Because I’ll tell you neither of those are remotely true.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up…

      Oh hey, I keep thinking about doing this to and hosting a website like the old days lol, but when I search about it the biggest thing that comes up is like LoRa, but ig it’s too slow for hosting internet-like services

      • jimerson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Meshtastic is 80% geeky fun hobby, 20% preparedness, and 0% ready to facilitate anything more than simple text messages. Still neat, though.

          • jimerson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s true, but from what I’ve seen they haven’t really been a standard in the nodes that folks are building.

        • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Yeah, we’ve got some T-decks and so far it’s only been a novelty and the intended purpose is just so we can text from a decent distance if infrastructure goes down. Will probably also see some occasional use camping as a backup for our radios with a T-beam attached to a bear bag up in a tree as a relay.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Is this really shocking with the incoming sadministration?

    That’s not a typo.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Comment section tries not to blame Biden for actions taken by the judicial branch, with judges appointed by Bush and Trump. Difficulty: Impossible.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.

    “Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.’s vacillations,” the court ruled.

    “Nyyeaahh nyyeaah nyyeaaaahh ppffthhhhthhth!!” they said.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      So now all regulatory policy has to through the fucking gauntlet of legislative process where the wealthy will just veto everything that doesn’t benefit them…this nation is captured beyond belief.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Like most large changes, it requires an act of Congress. Doing these via the executive leads to weak outcomes like this.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      6 days ago

      The thing is Congress doesn’t have time to deal with technical details. That’s why they passed a law authorizing the FCC to make exactly this kind of regulation. The conservative courts throwing everything they don’t like under the Major Questions Doctrine is just a way to make sure regulation never happens and Corporations are free to exploit people however they want. The problem here isn’t the FCC, it’s bad faith judges with the power to stop the entire government.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Regulating ISPs as a utility is a pretty big change, not simply a technical detail; it is in the purview of Congress.

        Congressmen aren’t individually drafting bills, they direct their aids to draft the bills and hammer out the details. We don’t need to overhaul our system, we need congressmen to do their job rather than offloading their job to the Executive.

        Edit: Said bill would direct the Executive on how to regulate them as a utility at which point small technical details, as you mention, are handled by the Executive.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          ISPs are just transmitting a different kind of data on the same infrastructure backbone as the rest of our telecommunications. Don’t act like it’s some huge difference.

          And they are doing their jobs, they’d have to hire exponentially more staffers to go over what was in bills or just vote the way their preferred donor says to vote. Which do you think is more likely there?

          Congress has the power to delegate regulations, they used that power, and now a radical judiciary is claiming the plain text of the Constitution doesn’t mean what it clearly means.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    tbf it’s not hard to convince hayseed chucklefuck trumplings that regulations which exist to protect them are a bad thing because they cost money. we had condo buildings collapsing and people dying WITH regulations.

    when bridges start collapsing left and right, they’ll blame drag queens and the maga trumpistan patriots will lap it up like hogs at the trough

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is ridiculous how difficult it is to get this law through. Clearly it must be something good. I am 100% behind it.

  • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Does anyone know where President Muskrat stands on NN? Maybe there might be some silver lining there in that whole shit show :(

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Lol I edited the post just after posting to add in a paywall bypass link already, your instance might be having a federation delay