• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    To anyone bemoaning BlueSky’s lack of federation, check out Free Our Feeds.

    It’s a campaign to create a public interest foundation independent from the Bluesky team (although the Bluesky team has said they support them) that will build independent infrastructure, like a secondary “relay” as an alternative to Bluesky’s that can still communicate across the same protocol (The “AT Protocol”) while also doing developer grants for the development of further social applications built on open protocols like the AT Protocol or ActivityPub.

    They have the support of an existing 501c(3), and their open letter has been signed by people you might find interesting, such as Jimmy Wales (founder of Wikipedia).

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      I feel like the reason the reason why it’s taking off so much is because it’s not federated.

      It’s like people hear the term federation and they get afraid. I know it’s not that simple but still.

      In other words, people don’t know what they actually need.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        39 minutes ago

        People are not afraid of the term “Federation.“ They literally have no clue what it is.

        It’s the instance concept I find consistently to be an issue. It’s an extra layer/barrier to entry. You don’t just create an account. You have to understand what an instance is and then determine which one you’re joining and what that means for your moment to moment usage of the platform.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is this 30 million accounts created? Active user numbers would be a lot more meaningful.

    As an illustration, if you have a platform that’s gaining 100,000 users each month and losing 100,000 other users each month, it’s basically going nowhere. But it will eventually reach this “30 million users” milestone too if all it means is account creations.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      Active user numbers is probably less than 1 million, but still, 30 million accounts created is quite likely pretty good.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        It’s something, but there’s really no frame of reference to know if it’s good or how good. Because companies rarely talk about this number. Twitter might have billions of accounts created if we look at all time.

        Actives are what count.

  • ErinCrush@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As a former mastodon believer, Bluesky is so much better. I’m sorry but the kind of content I wanted on mastodon was never there. Bluesky feels good. Things change, for sure. For now though? This is the best we have for a replacement for Twitter.

    • anon593839@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I find Lemmy to be a better reddit alternative than Mastodon is a twitter alternative.

      The lack of an infinitely scrollable algorithmic feed in Mastodon is definitely better societally, but let’s be real, the algorithmic feed is just way more fun to scroll in blue sky.

  • oshu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve come to realize that bluesky already had all lot of what I’m happy to not see on masto. Good that there is a place for it to exist without me.

    That content is also probably what the majority of people like about it.

  • Spaniard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I never had a twitter account, not because of political beliefs but because the core of that social network is bullshit and the internet should be better than that.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s literally just Shower Thoughts: The Website.

      I really don’t understand the appeal.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is a decent format for businesses, organizations, musicians/comedians/touring acts etc. to announce events and goings on to the general public. For discourse, it’s complete garbagepuke.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What annoys me is that people are buying the idea that BlueSky is federated.

    Not only is it not federated, the very architecture they designed means that it’s probably not federateable, at least not by normal users.

    The way they designed it, a relay is required to collect and forward every single BlueSky post. That means, as the service grows, it becomes more and more impossible for anybody but a company to run a relay. Someone did some calculations back in November when it was a significantly smaller network, and they calculated that at a minimum it costs a few hundred dollars, possibly as much as 1000 bucks a month just to handle the disk storage needs for a relay on a leased server. The more the network grows, the more those costs skyrocket.

    What good does it do to have a network that theoretically can be federated, but practically costs so much to run a single node that nobody except a for-profit company can manage it?

  • noctivius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    another trash platform its just matter of a time, use mastodon and fediverse to don’t migrate again in few years

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Mastodon and the fediverse are nerd shit with massive usability issues. Even I gave up on Mastodon and I would consider myself far more willing to put up with shit than the average user will ever be. The mass will - never - migrate to the fediverse and in many ways, especially looking at moderation issues, that is probably a good thing.

      • RxBrad@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I love Mastodon. It’s easily my favorite & most-used social media platform right now.

        But I’m also a huge damn nerd.

        I honestly can’t say I’d recommend it to anyone that isn’t also a huge damn nerd, because they just won’t find stuff they want.

        “You want sports? We don’t have much of that, but check out the Proxmox server in this guy’s basement!”

      • AbackDeckWARLORD@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s interesting what a bubble lemmy users are in. There is a reason it is not taking off and did not replace reddit for many people that tried it. It’s way too daunting and confusing for the average user, same with mastodon.

      • renegadesporkA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Roughly 10 million.

        I would consider 1/3 a notable contender. Granted, only ~1 million of those users are active daily, but that’s still very significant for a FOSS alternative.

        EDIT: Source

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Federation is too confusing for the average bear. the success of bsky is the best thing for getting people off twitter

    • Internetexplorer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Does it have anything to do with crypto and decentralisation? I heard it did but it doesn’t seem like it does at all. Disappointing

  • Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I looked at the terms of service and noticed that they bind you into arbitration, limit your terms to $100, mandate you to travel to Delaware for dispute, and force you into mass arbitration if your dispute is similar to others.

    Pass

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      While I understand that, I’m in America. My first priority has to be getting people off of Twitter.

      Would I prefer open source, non-profit software? 100%. It’s the smarter and better choice for so many reasons.

      But if Bluesky is going to gain critical mass, I’m not going to fight it. I’m having a hard enough time getting people off Twitter. I’ve written the media address of environments I’m familiar with asking them to organize a move, and I mentioned both Bluesky and Mastodon.

      • Peffse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re not thinking evil enough, honestly. Two examples off the top of my head, each being fairly innocent mistakes: If you enter your phone number for 2FA, it’s not going to be public-facing. It’s their responsibility to keep that information private from internal and external threats. Ok, so what if it leaks… right? Oh, it turns out the hacker SIM swapped your phone number for the 2FA, and did a password reset on your account via support chat. Still no big deal, its just social media… Except you’ve been giving updates to all your patreon backers on your project that’s shipping soon. It suddenly vanishes off the internet, replaced with a crypto scheme, and all your supporters just flooded your bank with chargebacks. Your attempts at getting your account back are met with silence and your supporters are now furious. Was any of that your fault? No. You get $100.

        Let’s try another example: Bounty programs are used by companies to collect bugs and other possibly exploits so they can be fixed. “Too expensive, nobody will know if there’s a bug anyway.” So the app on Google Play store gets installed by 30 million users with a critical flaw… if a very specific image is opened in it, the phone bricks. All the news sites cover the bug, pushing the image to the front page. You open the app and… Your expensive phone just died. Were you at fault for that? No. You get to join the arbitration group and get an individual settlement of $12.

        Think more evil. Don’t stick with the “I have nothing to lose” because you almost always have something to lose. The fact these terms were even thought of and written means you do have a financial investment in the platform.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          …how would them ignoring requests cause injury??? We’re still talking about bluedky, right? The online twitter clone without musk as it’s main selling point?

          • Tyfud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 day ago

            If someone was doxxing you on bluesky, for example, and in the doxxing, you got attacked/injured by someone who recognized you/went to your house.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              That is an ass pull if I’ve ever heard one.

              Let me make sure I understand your comment correctly.

              You’re saying that if you post information publically, on a platform whose whole concept is that everything is public, and someone uses information you posted there to identify you, stalk you, break and enter, and then assault you…that it’s the fault of the service you used to post that identifying information?

              That’s the arguement being made?

              • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, I believe the argument they’re making is if someone else posts your private information on BlueSky (think Kiwifarms doxxing gay people and sending that info to Christian hate groups), and BlueSky moderation doesn’t take action against the account posting the info, and then somebody uses that information to find and attack you, then BlueSky is culpable in the attack because they could’ve done something, but didn’t.

                A better example, I think, would be the recent issue with known transphobe Jesse Singal and his followers, who came to BlueSky around a month ago and immediately began posting bigotry and false info. When reported to the moderation team, they did nothing about it (he actually got banned by the auto-mod and then manually unbanned during that period, but that’s another story). If he were to do something like my example, posting a trans person’s private information online and telling his followers to harass them, and BlueSky did nothing to remove the posts or his account, then they’d be legally culpable for enabling anything that might happen to you. But under arbitration, you can’t sue them for it.

                • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Ah, THAT explaination at least has legs. All these other responses I’m getting are these abstract “mouse trap if everything goes exactly like this”, sort of explainations.

                  Although, I still don’t think financial recouperation is the path I’d take. I would be pressing legal charges. Like, criminal acts go to prison type charges.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Would you say it is a one in a 30 million occurrence, roughly?

                It was an asspull example but there are similar cases in the past. Forced arbitration of any lawsuit you present for any reason is bad, be it as simple as their software accidentally bricking your phone or as major as an attempt on your life being ignored by the platform.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Off topic, but I pointing this out reminded me of visiting some ancap circles to see the crazy stuff they discuss. At one point there was a question about how externalities would be handled in their system of private courts and such. When ever I do read some terms and conditions there is almost always something in regard to arbitration. Predictably they were not happy about someone pointing that out and explaining that it is for the benefit of corporations not the customers.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whenever I see how they keep getting brought up, I’m always reminded of that Dilbert ep about how people just fall for blue logos that are easy on the eyes. They don’t even have to know what it is… just the fact that the stupid logo is blue is enough. lol