Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I heard “rightsizing” for the first time last year.

    I have no idea what knucklehead PR dumbass came up with that but it made the following layoffs even more unpalatable.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The only time I hear rightsizing is for cloud resources. I’ve never heard of it in human resources. That sucks.

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Alright, team, let’s circle back and ensure we’re fully aligned on our north star objectives. We need to leverage synergy, engage in blue-sky thinking, and touch base on our pain points to drive mission-critical outcomes. But let’s not boil the ocean with unnecessary jargon - at the end of the day, we need to optimize our bandwidth for real, value-driven impact. If we keep moving the needle with this kind of thought leadership theater, we risk losing sight of our core competencies and drowning in a sea of meaningless buzzwords. Let’s pivot toward clear, actionable insights and sunset the overuse of strategic messaging before it becomes a blocker to true innovation. Instead of just playing the fast-follow game with every trending framework, let’s focus on original, high-impact execution that actually drives results.

    Thoughts? Chris, do you have any builds?

    No?

    Good. Then let’s action this and drive it across the finish line!

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Good catch!”

    Usually said when you bring up something that needs fixing, and said as a way to puff you up and not actually follow up on the problem.

  • jade52@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago
    1. Alignment
    2. Scalable
    3. Circle back

    If you use these regularly I KNOW the meeting you just booked me into should have been an email.

      • jade52@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I can’t remember last time I heard someone use it in a normal conversation, but in the corporate world I find it gets incredibly overused.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I guess it doesn’t bug me so much because it’s not so cringe and actually clearly communicates the point. We do in-house video editing at the company I work at, and when we talk about scaling we’re talking about making sure our processes hold when we add more and more people and increase our volume. It’s a growing company so I have to constantly talk about anticipating and buying things to make sure we don’t run into a wall with our growth.

          I guess this is less pushing back and more asking what word you would rather see?

      • jade52@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I spend more time in meetings talking about the work I’m going to do, than doing the actual fucking work.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Unless there is a need for faster communication or because it covers a topic that people have strong emotions about and need to see how others respond so they don’t assume the other person’s feelings about something. There are some cases where humans, being social animals, do need some interaction beyond words to accomplish coordinated tasks.

        The vast majority of meetings should be emails though. Just wish people actually read emails…

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “Tribal knowledge.”

    • image: We, clan. Together, strong.
    • reality: Ask Tommy if he remembers how to reset the printer

    Though, I actually like this one. It’s a pretty cool phrase you can use anywhere.

  • KammicRelief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This isn’t strictly corpo-speak, but upper mgmt type people do this a lot:
    Misuse of the word “myself.” Like, “if you have any questions, talk to Joe or myself.”
    Nice one dumb-ass–you tried to sound smarter by adding syllables but it didn’t work, did it!

  • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t mind lunch and learns. I get overtime for that, AND they buy me lunch. I’m either stuck near the office for an unproductive hour I don’t get paid for, or at my desk working on the same shit I was earlier for an extra hour.

    But all the bullshit buzzwords attempting to paint employees standing up for themselves as bad things are obnoxious as hell: quiet quitting and the like