• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hopefully, single use plastics would be a ridiculous thing in the future, maybe they will look back at it like we look back at asbestos.

    Here is a funny asbestos ad from the past

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    porn was freely available and could be purchased at stores in many parts of the US.

    sex toys were widely available and could be purchased from the comfort of your own sex swing.

    now we have Qualuviagra which not only increases the size of your penis* but also makes you forget all about your low-T*

    *studies shown that penis size temporarily increases but long-term use will actually shrink it. prolonged use can induce Baby-Dick Syndrome (BDS). Abuse of the product is considered a class 1 felony and you will be registered as a sex offender unless you’re a registered Republican.

    *low T is a myth falsified by global warming scientists in order to confuse and belittle Republicans with BDS. If you are taking Qualuviagra to treat low-T, reach out to your nearest MediRogan for details about having low-T.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      20 years though? That’s incredibly generous and unlikely imo.

      People are refusing to tackle the infrastructure issue of people charging their cars who do not own single family detached homes. It’s a significant population of people for which owning an electric vehicle is a huge inconvenience. Public charging stations exist, but take significantly longer than the 2 minutes it takes to pump gas.

      The second big thing is that people simply don’t replace their cars that often. Might be pulling this out of my ass, but I had read recently that the average person replaces their vehicle every 7-12 years…and it is often not with a brand new vehicle. Considering how electric cars still make a very small percentage of those on the road, I can’t see 100% removal of gas vehicles in 20 years in only a few generations of vehicle ownership change.

      The Nissan Leaf came out around 15 years ago as the first big name, somewhat popularish electric vehicle. Yet in 2025 electric vehicles are nowhere close to even 50% of vehicles on the road.

      In the more distant future? Sure. 20 years ain’t happening tho.

      But we’ll see!

    • toddestan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unless something drastic happens, there will be a decent number of cars on the road in 20 years that are already on the road today.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not in 20 year mate.

      Oil has a massive problem, it is just too fucking good at what it does, energy density of a battery is far, far below petrol, and require complex infrastructure at the point of sale, while petrol can even be dispensed without electricity.

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    What the hell, I misread the OP’s title and thought it was about stuff that was common 20 years ago which is no longer normal… I was very confused with everybody else’s answers lmao.

    Sadly I can’t think of an answer for the thread, so downvote/upvote at your will 😂

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nope, I can’t see this happening either, unless bides take over.

      Toilet paper is actually rather effective, it is cheap, easily processed, effective enough at removing most of the crap, it does not require added water infrastructure (I would not clean my ass with grey water) and simple to teach new users

      • MrKurtz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you happened to touch shit with literally any part of your body other than your asshole, would you be happy with just wiping it with a piece of dry paper, or would you immediately go wash it?

        I have no more questions…

        Btw, don’t even get me started if you have a hairy butt.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Does your asshole touch a lot of surfaces?

          Mine mostly just touch my underwear…

          • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            So you’re OK with your asshole having some shit remaining on it because it only touches your underwear?

            I feel for your SO.

            • stoy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Ok, this is fascinating.

              This thread was about wiping with paper after going to the toilet, this was not a thread about general cleanliness.

              I shower every day, this obviously includes wasing my asshole.

              So now, I want an answer to this question.

              What in this entire thread gave you the impression that I never wash my asshole?

              I stand by what I wrote, wiping after using the toilet is fine, it obviously is a temporary solution until the next proper shower, but that is fine.

              • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I think the main takeaway here is that you recognize washing is the appropriate thing to do, but are OK with a temporary wipe until your next shower. People are saying with a bidet you don’t have to wait, you use wash each time.

                I agree it’s gone off the rails and I’m partly to blame. I just don’t understand peoples reluctance to use bidets.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Single-use plastic, yeah. Things like Tupperware will stick around unless we go back to using asphalt for food preservation.

      I think we’re going to see single use wax-paper or similar displace the plastic and Styrofoam for your delivery order.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    People probably wouldn’t believe we sold water in plastic water bottles or shopped with disposable plastic bags.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Where I live, plastic bags and styrofoam are already rare now. Now we just have to wait for people to realize water is free.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You should go on street view and check out Asia, whenever I visited Thailand and see a backroad, there is a huge number of used plastic bottles lying next to the road.

          They still get drinking water from bottles.

          Weather that is the case in large cities like Bangkok I don’t know as I haven been there enough to learn.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    20 years is a bit short but… Eating animals will be regarded as highly immoral, “but everyone knew those animals suffered, right?”, on the same level as we now judge slavery

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s sadly impossible until we guarantee food for everyone. It’s a luxury to choose where and what your next meal is.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          This is so weird. Do people realize animals need to eat? Why don’t we eat that food directly? Eating animals makes for less food, not more. Like how 75% of soy is cattle feed, and then vegans get blamed for deforestation for soy beans. It’s ridiculous. Willful ignorance

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            hmmm… over here cows and sheep are fed on banana leaves and some tree I cannot name. I don’t know about you but either of these don’t float my boat too well

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Eh, only sorta. Plenty of animals can be fed on things we can’t eat. They tried raising rabbits in NK for example because they can survive off rocky ground that wouldn’t grow crops.

            Third world problem though. First world countries could be vegetarian easily.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is farfetched. People love meat, and we have for our entire history. Even India only has around 30% vegetarian population. The demand for not just protein but specifically meat will never go away.

      The only way I see us avoiding animal slaughter is by mastering bioengineering to the point where we can grow a perfectly marbled brisket in a lab without actually cloning the whole cow.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s true. They already evolved and most of us didn’t even realize. News feeds were added and gradually evolved to use information they know about is to push our buttons and affect our behavior and beliefs.

      They still needed content, but with generative AI that’s no longer necessary, this is why social media companies are so invested in it.

      Social media is no longer social it became a platform to manipulate people. It is much worse than traditional ways of propaganda, because each person gets their customized feed tuned to issues that are more likely to influence them.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Do you mean physical money in terms of paper/plastic/coins or money as a concept? If the latter, how would society function?

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Greed was a useful trait when it was down to survival of the fittest before we developed agriculture.

            After that, the usefulness of greed became less relevant over time, and I would argue that at this point, it’s counter productive.

            Just saying.