cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/165736

Lenovo Cuts the Windows Tax and offers Cheaper Laptops with Linux Pre-installed

At least in the U.S. and Canada, that is.

This was brought to my attention thanks to a Reddit post where a user (presumably a resident of Canada), had posted how Lenovo was shipping laptops with Fedora and Ubuntu at a cheaper price compared to their Windows-equipped counterparts.

Others then chimed in, saying that Lenovo has been doing this since at least 2020 and that the big price difference shows how ridiculous Windows’ pricing is.

Cutting the Windows Tax

When I dug in further, I found out that the US and Canadian websites for Lenovo offered U.S. $140 and CAD $211 off on the same ThinkPad X1 Carbon model when choosing any one of the Linux-based alternatives.

Lenovo Cuts the Windows Tax and offers Cheaper Laptops with Linux Pre-installedLenovo Cuts the Windows Tax and offers Cheaper Laptops with Linux Pre-installed

US pricing on left, Canadian pricing on right.

Interestingly, while the difference in pricing is noticeable, your mileage may vary if you are looking for such laptops on the official website. Not all models from their laptop lineup, like ThinkPad, Yoga, Legion, LOQ, etc., feature an option to get Linux pre-installed during the checkout process.

Luckily, there is an easy way to filter through the numerous laptops. Just go to the laptops section (U.S.) on the Lenovo website and turn on the “Operating System” filter under the Filter by specs sidebar menu.

Lenovo Cuts the Windows Tax and offers Cheaper Laptops with Linux Pre-installed

Yes, it’s as simple as that. You can do the same for the various official online regional storefronts that Lenovo runs to see whether Linux-based operating systems are being offered on their laptops in your country.

Closing Thoughts

It is good to see that Lenovo is offering Linux in its laptops. In fact, there is another big-name laptop manufacturer, Dell, who also does something similar with its Ubuntu-certified laptops, but both have the same constraint of having limited options for buyers.

Also, as far as I know, Dell doesn’t reduce the pricing if you choose Linux instead of Windows. Correct me if I am wrong in the comments.

Nonetheless, I think these manufacturers could do a better job in marketing these Linux-based alternative operating systems to general consumers, showing them how they can save big when opting for these instead of the pricey and bloated Windows.

Otherwise, we might have to start observing Windows Refund Day again.

💬 Your take on this? Would mainstream users benefit from having Linux pre-installed on their laptops?


From It’s FOSS News via this RSS feed

  • Daryl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Only on North America, you say?

    pity.

    For at least the last decade, Europe has been abandoning Microsoft in droves.

    I suspect soon Microsoft will be unknown in Europe except as “That system they use over there.”

  • theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A step in the right direction. If they don’t offer a price difference, they can keep it.

    We need better and longer term uefi/bios support as IBM/lenovo used to have systems that specifically prevent uefi Linux installs from booting.

    That trust was broken then, they do not have it now.

  • aicse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now they need to make the BIOS updates installable from Linux or ability to flash them from the BIOS. But I like this move, hope more start doing so.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s great! - But. But, I hope some people check it out carefully. Some years ago, Lenovo middle-man’d the SSL root certificate on laptops so they could inject ads into Https web pages. (And spy on users? Steal passwords? Manipulate bank accounts? I hope not…)

    I wonder what they could hide in an own Linux install?

    • AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Since installing Linux, my battery life has more than doubled.

      That alone is reason enough to switch to Linux

      • ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yeah, while I don’t have a laptop myself, I installed Fedora on my desktop and it idles quieter. I suspect it’s not doing as much in the background as Windows was.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I would really like to see broad support for TPM-backed FDE, which also requires secure boot to work to implement this properly.

      For me, this is essential to have for feature parity with Windows on laptop.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          As long as the user owns the TPM and has full control over it, I don’t see a problem. I paid for that hardware. I want to use it. There are already tools that can talk to it. It’s just not fully implemented and integrated into the system in a secure fashion. Indirectly, you kind of point out why there hasn’t been as much motivation to provide these features because they’re associated with the user giving up control, but it doesn’t have to be this way. The hardware can work for me if the support were there.

          With the right support, it can even be combined with the password. This lets me enforce that the drive only unlocks in this machine, with this password, and only with the software that I set. That’s certainly more secure than how most distros do FDE today. It covers more use cases and enables a much stronger threat model.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is awesome and I love it. Maybe they could even take a few more dollars off by not having any OS installed (bypassing the labor costs of imaging an SSD). I’ll be installing my own copy anyway, so I’m fine with a blank SSD.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      they tend to make money off it due to the bundle deals and commissions and what-not.

      a major oem charging $140-200 is all profit.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Perhaps it’s a direct response to the tarrifs, as well as an instance of a Chinese company finding a way to fuck over an American company now that trade relations across the board between the US and PRC are juddering to a halt.

    • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s usually 10% of the device MSRP for windows pro.

      There are some very low cost devices that get it for $10 for windows home…

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think you misunderstood what’s being discussed. In this post, all Windows versions cost money. It’s just they bake it into the advertised price and say Linux is a reduction, which means you’re paying the difference if you choose to go with the default. It isn’t free, no matter how they display it.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              In the post, Linux has a “negative” cost. In reality this means it’s closer to the base cost and the “free” Windows is baked into the price, not actually free. Both versions of windows have a cost. One is higher than the other though.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Just for you and your misreading: the previous guy said Windows Pro is 10% of MSRP. Well you open the pic in the original post and surprise it’s ~10% for Windows Home version. Aka just for you; you pay 10% for Windows HOME edition, aka everyone knows it’s not free because you just paid 10% for it. Windows Pro edition is a $ upgrade from the HOME edition, which for this offer puts Windows Pro closer to ~15%. Not the 10% the previous guy thought. The only person that misread and couldn’t follow the post is you.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  22 hours ago

                  OK, just so you’re aware, since you are being condescending, there’s two pictures. One of them Windows Home is ~10%, one Windows Pro is ~10%.

                  Both cost money. I don’t know what $ upgrade means, but I’m assuming you mean they cost extra, which both do no matter what, which is what I was talking about at first. It’s not only one that costs extra.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder what the labor is to install it. Well I guess it’s the same labor as Linux.

      Anyone know how they do it? Do they plug the drive into a cloning machine before installing it in the computer?

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hopefully they start selling the Linux version in my country ngl

  • trolololol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I quite like their laptops but they put the most horrible keyboards I’ve ever used. I’ve had chronic rsi and my fingers physically hurt less than 8h of use.

    Do they have high end laptops (32g RAM, top i7 or similar, for Android development) at reasonable prices with good keyboards? I’ve been on Xps for a while.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually prefer the Lenovo keyboard to any other laptop keyboard in existence. Be it HP, Dell, Microsoft, Asus, Acer or otherwise.

  • Gort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m in the UK, and last year got a Lenovo ThinkPad laptop with Linux pre-installed that was cheaper than the Windows equivalent. I had a choice of RAM, SSD, display and OS. Ubuntu was the only choice of Linux, though.

  • matelt@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m very new to Linux and a very casual user but I’m really loving it. I also can’t afford the existing Linux laptops, and I am on the market for a new machine. So yeah I’d buy a cheap laptop that ships with Linux. If it comes with a discount, that’s even better!

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would personally get a second hand cheap laptop off ebay or a local 2nd hand electronics store, and then just install the distro of your choice on it. Can’t really think of an instance where a computer would come with an OS and I’d just use it as-is rather than installing my own, but I guess if you want a fairly generic eg Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, Mint, etc setup then it could work. But definitely don’t limit yourself to preinstalled laptops, since installing an OS only takes an afternoon if you pick an OS with a more fine-grained install like Arch or Gentoo, and about the same time as installing user software for distros that have more streamlined installs.

      • matelt@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah also from a sustainability point of view that would be my preferred option. Thanks for the reminder that I don’t need new shiny things to be happy :D